Should We Abolish the Death Penalty, or is it Reliable?

"Many people live life worth death, some people die of life, can you give it to them?" (Torkin). The death penalty has been a part of society for a long time. Historians can go back to the first death penalty law since the 18th century. Throughout history, these laws have been transformed and transferred to different societies: new practices, new ways and compliant ways, and new reasons to use them. Some people think that the death penalty should be abolished because they have had an adverse effect on American ethics, but the opposition is true and those who believe that it should be kept as it is an important deterrent against future crimes There.

Should I abolish the death penalty? Well, this issue is not only talked about in news and political discussions, it is also a topic in our daily life. There are many people who want to abolish capital punishment. These people think that the human rights of offenders should not be ignored, and most developed countries abolish capital punishment. People can agree or disagree with this issue, but in my opinion the death penalty should not be abolished. First, many people believe that everyone, including criminals, has the right to survive, who believes that depriving their lives is very cruel. They think that killing is cruel. What about those victims? Do not they have the right to live? These criminals must have committed a serious crime, so they were punished by the death penalty. Therefore, this punishment has done a lot of cruel things for the victim, so I think that it is not too cruel.

Because the death penalty is no longer affected, my aim is to abolish US practice. Throughout the history of the Americans, a lot of people have tried to abolish the death penalty. Many people temporarily succeeded in abolishing the death penalty, but most states resumed death sentences after the judicial review. The latest issue regarding the abolition of the death penalty is Baze v.Rees. Baze V. Rees is an attack on the execution process, especially a fatal attack. Buzz thinks that a deadly injection is a cruel and unusual punishment violating the Constitution. The judge ruled that the death penalty was endorsed, so the discussion eventually failed. "The trial court issued extensive trials, detailed facts and legal conclusions.The attempt to eliminate the death penalty by BazeV. Rees was a good attempt, but in the end it had attacked the process rather than the problem I did not succeed.