Should Truman Have Used the Atomic Bomb?

On Friday, President Barack Obama became the first US president to visit Japan in Hiroshima. The president's historic visit took place 71 years after the United States launched the atomic bomb in this city during the Second World War.

In his live speech, Mr. Obama asked for the ultimate exclusion of nuclear weapons and a review of the questions he helped to win the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. "We must have the courage to escape from the logic of fear and pursue the world without nuclear weapons," he said. "This is the future we can choose, the future of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is not the dawn of nuclear war, but the beginning of our moral awakening."

President Obama 's journey provoked a controversy, apologizing to the atomic bomb for the president, to make the right decision that President Harry Truman uses the atomic bomb in 1945, and reconsider the decision on whether to kill only in Hiroshima I raised the question of whether or not. 100,000 atomic bombs. During the visit, Mr Obama met with a survivor of a nuclear explosion.

Several historians believe the atom bomb is the best choice for Truman to avoid invasion to Japan and long-term battles. But there are people who claim they do not have to rely on nuclear weapons, and Japan will surrender without the US abandoning bombs.

Does Truman need to use the atomic bomb to Japan during the Second World War? This is the opinion of the debate club.

President Truman has reason to abandon the atomic bomb. With the use of the atomic bomb, the war ended soon. Second, the use of the atomic bomb saved both lives. Finally, if war continues without using atomic bombs, war cost must not be higher than cost. Despite the plans of intrusion, the big decision that President Truman uses the atomic bombs quickly ended the war while saving life and money.

In 1945, Harry Truman said, "In viewing this bomb as a military weapon, there was no doubt that it should be used," in a handwritten document about the rise in the nuclear power era of 1958, I said. Hercules prophets raised the idea of ​​destroying the world with fire after the destruction of the water. As long as the great leaders of the world do not stop it, destruction is visible, "Do you think that recognition of Truman's use of atomic technology changed? Does Truman abandon the atomic bomb in 1958, do you need to take decisive action? why?

"With this bomb we now have added a new revolutionary destructive increase to complement our growing power of the troops," - President Truman. In 1945, President Truman faced atomic problems in the most devastating war seen by mankind so far. His choice is to bombard Japan or kill American soldiers. He chose to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He chose the most pretty choice in America at that time. - At the end of the Second World War, thousands of people died in Hiroshima in Japan. "Enola Gay has lost 9,000 pounds of TNT bomb called" Little Boy. " About 78,150 people died after death, but still radiation was deadly. Three days later, another bomb fell. Although the "fat" bomb that was shot down was 235 years uranium bomb, despite less damage than Hiroshima, the port of Nagasaki was still disjointed.