Should the U.S. have free universal healthcare? Pro

According to the US Census Bureau, the population of the United States who is not subscribed to health insurance in 2014 is 33 million (10.4% of the US population), which is unacceptable.

According to the US Demographic Review, the number of people who have not joined US health insurance in 2014 is the same as the number of people living in Texas in the same year.

The Declaration of Independence points out that all Americans belong to this state and that all males (men and women) have "unfair rights, including the pursuit of life, freedom, happiness".

A new bill that provides free health care for everyone will bring pain and death to our people as they can not pay for the health care plan

A new bill that provides free medical care to all people brings freedom to give equal access to health to not only our suffering victims but also prosperous people.

Our employees can be happy, they can enter the healthcare facility and know that they will receive treatment without being sued

The right to health care is not only accepted by our Declaration of Independence but also internationally recognized human rights.

On 10th December 1948, the United States and 47 other countries signed the UN World Human Rights Declaration. "Everyone has the right to living standards appropriate to the health and welfare of themselves and their families including medical care"

Although this declaration is one step in the right direction, the US government does not point out the content stated in the declaration as "everyone is receiving medical treatment." Right to health "in 70 years

Since 2005, under the Bush administration, according to the National National Council meeting, the price of health insurance has almost tripled. In 2017, $ 5,714 was paid to cover insurance costs.

However, in the other 13 countries, they offer free medical services to people.

One of these countries is Israel and provides medical insurance to Israeli residents as basic rights offered by the government. If they want to choose their chosen private health insurance company, they can also provide the option to increase insurance.

In addition to guaranteeing life, freedom, happiness, such invoices not only guarantee everyone's health insurance but also leave room for those who change the amount they want to guarantee through private agencies.

Regarding the quality of the healthcare system in the US, there is a big controversy over other countries. The National Health Plan physician, a single payment system supporting the National Health Care Advocacy Organization, claimed that free market healthcare solutions will result in lower quality care and improved mortality than publicly funded systems It is. The quality of medical institutions and medical care has also been criticized by the same group. According to a survey by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2000, the industrial state system based on public funds has less expenditure on healthcare as a proportion of GDP and expenditure per capita, with excellent population-based health care outcomes I am enjoying it.

Universal healthcare is defined as three different parts by the World Health Organization. First, "Ensure fairness of medical services" (2017). Second, "the quality of health services should be sufficient to improve the health of people receiving care" (2017). Thirdly, "People should be protected from economic risk" (2017). This system is introduced in most countries of the world, such as Thailand, Rwanda, Sweden, Canada. In the United States, I am trying to break the answer to this question, but how should global healthcare enterprises provide medical services to citizens?