Should the U.S. have dropped the atomic bomb?

The Japanese predicts that the secret death of 20 million people are protecting their homeland islands. A modified US estimate is expected to reach 4 million Allied casualties, including 1 million dead. Needless to say, the 6 million Soviet troops who have just entered the battlefield of conflict, they are ruthless in battle and tend to die for thousands of people.

In contrast, the A - bomb dies between 150,000 and 250,000, depending on the source. When seeing these statistics, can you really say that they are unnecessary? There is no doubt that they have saved the lives of millions of people.

Of course, it can be said that the use of nuclear weapons has produced a nuclear precedent that led to the Cold War, but since the Soviet Spy also joined the Manhattan Project and executed a nuclear weapons program in Russia, the Soviet Spy himself is also developing nuclear weapons .

Other historians say the United States has abandoned its powers to demonstrate its power. This is absolutely garbage, the US border is relatively harmless, and the industry is growing rapidly in export and war manufacturing industry. Regardless of the presence or absence of the atomic bomb, the United States is in the most extreme position in the postwar world.

Also, some people are using bombs in areas where the population is not dense, but where can we guarantee that Japan will notice this warning? While some cities completely denied the threat of extinction promised in the Potsdam Declaration and suffered 97% loss due to region explosion and incendiary bombs, Japan still refused to surrender.

In other places, historians believe that ongoing sea blockade and regular bomb attacks ultimately paralyze Japan, but the intention of the United States and its allies on this point has been furious for six years There is no intention to further sense the war. A quick way to quit is easy to get. In any case, as the Soviet invaded the other side, the lives of the allies are still lost in their horde, not to mention the life of a fanatical defender. Not only are the Japanese military protecting these islands, they are millions of "civilian militia", and everyone is expected to fight the last bullet.

I saw these comments on "Non-confidential documents presumed to cause 40,000 to 60,000 deaths", but I had no choice but to make your innocence laugh. Iwo Jima alone has nearly 50,000 casualties, but this is an excessive territory, but the Japanese island will be another battle.

The Japanese terrain makes the invasion of the land highly predictable to the defender, and the planned guerrilla resistance can cause a war of wear. There will be millions of deaths, there is no problem

I am a former member of the British army and I am a student of the 3rd year history in the USA. I will challenge to everyone of you to come up with a more thorough study of the discussion.

This old newspaper article describes a critical analysis of US nuclear bomb use in Japanese politics and concludes that abandonment of the atomic bomb is not necessary to stop the war in connection with the atomic bombings of Japan and the United States. The history of the United States asserts that it was to stop the war from replacing the human justice of humans except for human bomb attacks. However, the opportunity for the US to give up bombs was politically born, bomb bombardment began nuclear weapons competition. This newspaper article is a good explanation of how to decide to give up the main idea of ​​a bomb.

The use of atomic bombs in Japan is a very controversial issue. In other words, there are two aspects. One is to use an atomic bomb and the other is to use an atomic bomb. The ultimate reason to use the atomic bomb is to save the lives of American soldiers from Japanese land invasion. The Japanese army is very strong, and I am worried that many people will have more victims of Americans. However, I believe that many people should not use the atomic bomb. One of the reasons is that the fall of the atomic bomb causes thousands of innocent Japanese lives to be tragically lost. Many scientists also oppose the use of the atomic bomb. In particular, scientist Leo Szilard believes that nuclear weapons competition with Russia will occur by abandoning atomic bomb survivors.