Should the Government Limit the Size of Sugary Drinks?

New York City recently approved a ban on using more than 16 ounces of sugar drink at all restaurants, cinemas and stadiums to fight obesity. Some people praised the mayor of the city to solve important public health problems, as he ban smoking in restaurants in all cities. Others believe that the mayor restricts consumer choices and turns New York City into a "nanny's country."

Michael M. Grynbaum wrote on September 13, "Health Group has approved to restrict the sale of large sugar drinks".

To reduce the proportion of uncontrolled obesity, the New York City Health Department on Thursday approved the sale of large sodas and other sweet drinks at restaurants, street carts, cinemas. This is the first prohibition in the country.

Measures proposed by Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg may certainly exacerbate the national debate about soft drinks and obesity and may cause lawsuits in other cities. anxiety

Immediately after the vote, Mr. Bloomberg said, "This is the biggest step taken by every city to control obesity." "This is certainly not the last step a lot of cities should take."

Measures prohibiting the sale of many sugar drinks in containers exceeding 16 ounces will be enforced on March 12 unless prevented by the judge. Although the Health Committee's vote is the only regulatory approval needed to obtain a ban, the US soft drink industry strongly disagrees with this bill and this week will probably fight it in the court in another way I swear it.

Or do you think the market should decide the size of a sweet drink? Ultimately, if consumers think something is too big, they will not buy it.

Do you want to order large sweet drinks at fast food restaurants and cinemas? Does this ban influence your drinking habits?

Please give the following comments to the students aged 13 and older. Please use only your name. For reasons of privacy policy, students' comments will not be posted using the last name.

Teacher: We will announce the issue of opinion of the new students everyday. And we express our opinion in the most open and indefinite way. The following is a list of 163 questions received during the 2011-12 academic year.

The government should not limit the size of candied drinks. The government can help public health by improving hospitals and medical care. It is not government's job to decide people's consumption. Citizens and companies should decide the size of drinks. In addition, people often share a big drink bottle with others. Sharing a big bottle is cheaper, easier, and more environmentally friendly. If people eat less sugar, people who have health problems such as obesity and tooth decay will be less. Limiting the size of candied drinks is a good way to prevent health problems. In addition, to share a large bottle of beverages, you usually need to purchase additional paper cups. This is also expensive and harmful to the environment. My teacher agrees me that the government should limit the size of the candied drink.

In the United States, nearly 78.6 million people are obese, and some may argue that limiting the size of a candied drink will greatly help reduce this statistic. The only problem limiting the size of a sweet drink is that the idea itself is not practical. In a survey conducted by the University of California, San Diego, restricting the size of sugar drinks actually meant to eat more things. Employers can also find ideas for limiting the size of sweet drinks. For example, a company can usually sell two 16 ounce sodas with 32 ounces of soda. The intention of restricting the size of candied beverages is excellent, but Americans have the right to choose even if they are wrong.

It is the responsibility of the individual to manage the intake of sugar. For the children it is the responsibility of the parents to ensure that the children do not drink too much sweet drink. Just because the government limits the size of candied drink does not guarantee people will eat less sugar. It is a better idea to teach children to teach nutrition and make healthy choices at school. Ashley is the winner today. Henry committed a logical mistake called authority. This paradox occurred when the debate talked about the opinion of an authoritative figure such as Henry's teacher. If you want to include them in their arguments, be sure to include the reason why authority figures have this opinion.