Should the Government Limit the Size of Sugary Drinks?

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), "About half of the population of the US drinks candied beverages at any time". Cities such as New York prohibit sugar drinks over 16 ounces at all restaurants, cinemas and stadiums. Mayor New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg suggested banning boycotts of obesity epidemics in his city. To reduce obesity "

In the United States, nearly 78.6 million people are obese, and some may argue that limiting the size of a candied drink will greatly help reduce this statistic. The only problem limiting the size of a sweet drink is that the idea itself is not practical. In a survey conducted by the University of California, San Diego, restricting the size of sugar drinks actually meant to eat more things. Employers can also find ideas for limiting the size of sweet drinks. For example, a company can usually sell two 16 ounce sodas with 32 ounces of soda. The intention of restricting the size of candied beverages is excellent, but Americans have the right to choose even if they are wrong.

The government should not limit the size of candied drinks. The government can help public health by improving hospitals and medical care. It is not government's job to decide people's consumption. Citizens and companies should decide the size of drinks. In addition, people often share a big drink bottle with others. Sharing a big bottle is cheaper, easier, and more environmentally friendly. If people eat less sugar, people who have health problems such as obesity and tooth decay will be less. Limiting the size of candied drinks is a good way to prevent health problems. In addition, to share a large bottle of beverages, you usually need to purchase additional paper cups. This is also expensive and harmful to the environment. My teacher agrees me that the government should limit the size of the candied drink.

In the United States, nearly 78.6 million people are obese, and some may argue that limiting the size of a candied drink will greatly help reduce this statistic. The only problem limiting the size of a sweet drink is that the idea itself is not practical. In a survey conducted by the University of California, San Diego, restricting the size of sugar drinks actually meant to eat more things. Employers can also find ideas for limiting the size of sweet drinks. For example, a company can usually sell two 16 ounce sodas with 32 ounces of soda. The intention of restricting the size of candied beverages is excellent, but Americans have the right to choose even if they are wrong.

It is the responsibility of the individual to manage the intake of sugar. For the children it is the responsibility of the parents to ensure that the children do not drink too much sweet drink. Just because the government limits the size of candied drink does not guarantee people will eat less sugar. It is a better idea to teach children to teach nutrition and make healthy choices at school. Ashley is the winner today. Henry committed a logical mistake called authority. This paradox occurred when the debate talked about the opinion of an authoritative figure such as Henry's teacher. If you want to include them in their arguments, be sure to include the reason why authority figures have this opinion.