Should technology replace human labor?

First of all, I am extremely sad when people at 52% (when I released) especially voted for "No" after reading all the arguments on both sides of this "problem". This shows a lack of basic economic understanding

(1) "Work" is not restricted - "work" refers to the approach to a specific direction that other people desire. As long as humans have desires, they will do the work. This means that there are lots of "work" to do. If for some reason we offer all our wishes and needs with automation, please look at 4

(2) Considering the # 1 above, therefore, the economy is coordinated and newer "work" due to the increasing number of automation work (and paying attention to continuously reducing the cost of these services) Will be available to humans. These tasks tend to be higher than automatic work.

(3) The economic structure has changed, the basic necessity and necessity are close to or equal to zero cost, and are offered free of charge. Since the price of goods and services is pure value judgment of consumers and prices tend to be always basic production costs, automation becomes cheaper and manufacturing costs of products become lower, and then the final The price will be cheaper. This constant economic restructuring is always in us, which means that there is frictional unemployment to change "employment", but large unemployment and poverty are possible unless artificial restrictions are introduced not. Policies and regulations)

(4) Continuously providing human desire / desire If this cycle confirms to a certain extent that we are all satisfied, everything in our life is free ... then we Indeed the divinity was realized. (I always want "more" in our nature, so I think this is impossible). I do not think this is a bad thing.

Automation ... It will make everyone's life easier and better, and someone has to lose their "work" and then find other valuable uses to sell their workforce Hmm. There will always be "work"

To say that replacing technology with labor is wrong, why do not you cut the tree with a spoon? Or may you exchange cars or other technical inventions to double the value of our labor? After all, it is not "work" that we want, but "job" (food / resident / entertainment etc) that enables us to consume. It is impossible to build an economy in such a way that everything is automatically produced, but nobody can get it ... ridiculous argument

We are definitely facing the technical problem of replacing human labor in the past, but now more people are working than before. Why is this time different? Automatic looms replacing looms and embossing machines that replace blacksmiths replace manual work in environments that do not fit in molds - the world of mass production repeatedly. New automation technology is increasingly being replaced by human perception and recognition. In other words, it works in a troublesome world outside the factory and can perform tasks such as driving a truck and participating in a conversation with customer service. These technologies are growing exponentially

Labor automation is the practice of replacing technology with labor to perform specific tasks or tasks. Automation includes mechanization, but it is also extended by using technology to further eliminate people from work. Today's terms are usually applied when deployed technology is not just a manual process but replaces a knowledge base task or location. The root of automation is in mechanization, it can be traced back for centuries - for thousands of years - in history people are using technologies (rough tools like stoneware) to replace human duties Even). An example of mechanization is backhoe, which replaces the use of manual labor to dig. The development and deployment of cash automated teller machines (ATM) is a clear example of automating knowledge-based tasks using kiosks at airports rather than manually checking passengers and issuing flight documents is.