Should police officers be required to wear body cameras?

More and more people requested all police to use the essential body camera after the body camera was shot after the nurse was arrested by violence. Proponents argue that records between police and citizens have significantly reduced violence and protected police officers by providing objective evidence of violence to them. However, critics believe that body cameras are expensive and cause privacy problems for policemen and citizens. What do you think? What? What?

There is strong evidence that human body cameras can improve the interaction between civilians and police. In a one-year survey in Orlando, we found that the use of force by police officers who are using private cops and private complaints decreased by 53%, even 65%.

Many officials have reported that these devices have changed the behavior of citizens and helped alleviate confrontation between citizens and police. They also said that the human camera improved the collection of evidence and helped them recall the incident more accurately and fill in the report.

Others believe that human cameras can not solve the problem. Police shooting officers in Minneapolis who shot Justin Damon (an unarmed Australian woman) used a human body camera, but could not open them. Even in the case of video evidence it does not prove to be a more serious systematic problem leading to convictions or resolutions of police violence.

That's all there is to the video. The systematic problem faced by the police far surpasses the evidence that there is sufficient evidence that they have been convicted in the courtroom or that they are accountable to the public.

However, the victims' families of violence by police still insist on the use of human body cameras. Brown's family announced a statement affirming their commitment to the police for fuselage camera after the police shot a teenager Michael Brown not armed with Ferguson, Missouri.

We are very disappointed that our murderer will not face the outcome of his actions. We know that many people share our pain, but we ask you to guide your frustration in a way that can bring forward a positive change. We need to work together to fix the system that makes this possible.

Still, many people think that body cameras are police and general privacy violations.

Unlike dashboards, officers uniforms and those who wear special eyeglasses can enter the home or hotel room. Unlike the dashboard, the default display of simple conversations at the time of arrest and victims, witnesses, information providers is intimate relationship. Many people think that car cameras are tools for accountability of police, but the main target of their surveillance is not the police - it is the public.

"The cops should be asked to wear a camera on their body, a body-mounted camera provides important information about the quality of interaction between police officers, the public, the media and researchers. These videos do not solve all the discussions about the appropriateness of the actions of officials they describe, but the information they have revealed can advance empirical police reform.The police and the public Effective way of behavior and action Every method of resistance reduction (ie use of force), civilian complaints reduction, civilian injury reduction, and public injury reduction are all net plus Implementation

Almost all Americans (89%) support the police wearing human body cameras to record their job interactions. 53% is "strong support", 35% is "somewhat support". Only 11%, while the police are wearing a body camera. The scope of support extends to population and political organizations. During the superparty days, the police body camera gathered bipartisan approval. Most (58%) of those who have good opinion to the police stated that police officers should be allowed to see the video before issuing a statement. Of the people with bad opinion, the majority (71%) said they should refuse access to the camera before announcing the official statement.

Supporters who improve the transparency of law enforcement agencies can understand that they want to see more police officers wearing internal cameras. In addition to the evidence that police wearing a car camera caused a decline in the police "military force" incident, police camera lenses provide useful evidence for police fraud allegations . However, despite the advantages of police cameras, there are still significant privacy concerns that must be considered and addressed as they become more general.