Should Marriage Be Left To The States?

My short answer is "no", but I will explain. Before answering my view, it is useful to look at the situation, what to do. Currently family law is mainly determined by the state. State married and can obtain the legal result of marriage in the same state as the procedure to do Who decides the right. In all these problems, the states are different. However, national behavior is limited by the requirements of its own constitution and the US Constitution.

What should the issue of same-sex marriage be entrusted to that state's competition? Justice Kennedy stated that a prudent approach would not work. April DeBoer and Jane Rowse wanted to protect the child plaintiff, especially as he wrote that there is a sense of urgency here. "For children and their children, I will give it as soon as a child," he wrote. Of course, as far as the Constitution is concerned, basic rights are appropriate, considering the democratic reform process so that this process does not weaken. ...... Our constitutional system is that dynamic individuals do not have to wait for legal action before basic rights claim. The court in a state open to the victim came to them to prove that they have their direct personal interest in our basic charter. Even if the injury refuses to act, even if the general person does not agree, if the injury can invoke the rights protected by the constitution

The following facts are undisputable: Ted Cruz considers marriage a marriage between men and women. He needs to revise the legalization of the Constitution, Gay Marriage, but he also believes that he must be strong and state powers, "Marriage is a matter to be left in the state. "Also, I know that supporters of Cruz and its apartments will have supper, presidential elections not supported, as well as Weiderpass Cruz and Ressner, of dinner (though, I did it). "Just three months ago, I was held at the Hotel Out Hotel" Reserve Hillary activities, the number of participants reached 900, "Raisner said. Also:

It is necessary to determine the problem between all married couples (state race is not involved but race in equality 14 is involved). Obergefell's V. Hodges must refuse, the regulation of marriage should be determined by the state, the traditional marriage of Michigan needs to trigger the law. Prior to this ruling, most states have laws that determine marriage like men and women. In some states, members of the heterosexual definition of marriage came to be incorporated. The federal government passed the "marriage law defense" law recognized only marriage between men and women. The government does not recognize them by telling the definition of the state of marriage violating the concept of federalism and the Federal Government does not recognize the state based on their definition of marriage it is correctly covered I can not. . Also, liberal schools are insisting on cherishing the precedent