Should it be easier to amend the U.S. Constitution?

In order to prevent a sudden change in the basic principles of the country, it is necessary to deliberately revise the importance of the country's establishment document. When our founder drafted, they wanted to make sure that the process of making changes required was long and tedious, especially that it required the government to change it unless it was what people really wanted . Otherwise the government can completely rewrite the constitution

Do you remember the age of alcohol bans? The group of people are angry because many people are drunk, committing domestic violence and violence and causing all these problems due to alcohol. Prosperity I have not drunk any more. For everyone. If you do not want to go to jail. This is a revision of the Constitution, on the 18th, concretely as follows.

One year after the approval of this agreement, manufacture, sale or transport of sickness in jurisdictions where all drinks are imported for all regions and drinks in the United States is forbidden.

Congress and some countries should also have the right to enforce this article through appropriate legislation.

This provision will be invalid unless some national legislative body as provided in the Constitution approves this Constitutional amendment within seven years from parliamentary filing date to the state.

The only way you can drink legally is if you have it when you approve it. If it disappears, you just can not go to the store to buy more. Yeah, it is a liar - that's another problem.

It is forbidden to transport or import state, region, or property in the US to provide or use a drunkard in violation of that law.

This provision shall not be effective unless the amendment has been ratified by numerous domestic conventions within seven years from the date of the parliament's submission to the state pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution.

So you have it. One thing, it is unconstitutional to buy six packs of beer. Today, thousands of people are doing this at any time.

The last note between the US and Texas Constitution includes a constitutional amendment procedure. It is extremely difficult to modify the US Constitution, but it is not necessary to frequently revise the structure of the document. The US Constitution has only been corrected 27 times, of which 10 (the Bill of Rights) are part of the founding document. By contrast, the Texas Constitution is relatively easy to modify. It is a bit difficult to amend the Constitution (it requires a majority of two-thirds of Congress), but it is relatively easy to pass through when the proposal is approved by Congress. The governor can not decide whether to amend the Constitution Proposals can be implemented if a simple majority of ordinary votes is passed.

Article 5 of the Constitution stipulates that each country plays an important role in the amendment process of the US Constitution. The proposed amendment can be proposed by Congress with two thirds of the House and Senate votes, or two thirds of the Legislature. In order to be part of the Constitution, the amendment must be decided by Congress - three quarters of the Legislature or three quarters of the provincial state ratify the treaty. Regardless of the population of the country or the length of the alliance, voting in each state (acceptance or rejection of amendment) has the same weight.

It is very difficult to revise the US Constitution. The amendment should pass two thirds of the approval of both houses and then be approved by three quarters of the state legislature. Since 1787, only 27 amendments were passed. Many other people were proposed ... and rejected. Here are some noteworthy denials. In 1875, President Ulysses Grant made a speech and approved the use of federal funds to establish public schools nationwide. James Brian, the main lawmaker, agreed to Grant, not because he supported public education. He opposed narrow schools - Catholic schools (especially Catholic schools). This is mainly the result of the influx of immigrants from Ireland and Italy from two Catholic countries, and the anti-Catholic emotion in the United States is high. In the same year, Brian prohibited the use of public funds by religious groups under the Constitution.