Stem cells can replace worn or damaged tissue and are an alternative to organ donation. Since the organization is composed of recipient's own genetic material, it will rarely cause rejection by the recipient. As mentioned above, therapeutic cloning does not involve the creation of living people. However despite the advantages of therapeutic cloning, there is considerable controversy surrounding this topic. One argument for therapeutic cloning is that large-scale generation of stem cells requires the use of multiple human eggs.
A803 Should Patricia A. Baird and Chris McDonald allow human cloning? Yes, human cloning should be allowed (2000), and Patricia Baird, a medical genetics professor, has a strong and clear discussion on human cloning. In the second article, a moral philosopher, Chris MacDonald, responded to the opposition against Bird's human cloning and insisted a more cautious ban than a complete ban. Barlow reports that the value of natural resources goes up as the world moves towards globalization. This situation will be given to people with water and other resources, more economical and political power. 7 pages
Should reproductive cloning of humans be prohibited? Many people think human cloning is a good idea and it should be legal. On the other hand, some people believe and believe that human cloning is illegal and should be banned. Opponents argue that human cloning will divert resources from other more necessary medical needs and that the government may deviate from immoral reasons and practices for human cloning. The first reason is that depending on the number and quality of clones, many resources are required to create clones with taps. We need sufficient resources to maintain the health and safety of these clones. All of these clones can be transferred to individuals who have not cloned, making access easier. Secondly, in addition to moral reasons, it is highly unlikely that the government will use clones for evil purposes, so it is not advisable. Cloning can be used as slave labor