Should human cloning be allowed?

British biologist Sir John Gurudon pioneered the work of cloning frogs in the 1950's and 1960's - the research created dolly in 1996.

Gurdon said the time between cloned frog and sheep truck may be similar to the time waiting for the first human clone, according to The Life Scientific of BBC Radio 4.

He said: "When my first frog experiment was completed, a famous American journalist said," How long will it take these things to be able to be done with mammals or humans? " "

"I said," It may be between 10 and 100 years - about 50 years? From the dolly point of view it turns out that this is not that far, perhaps the same answer is appropriate is."

Supporters of cloning human beings have important uses such as cloning parents who have died tragically in accidents or diseases. This technology allows scientists to develop acceptable tissues and organs acceptable to humans without the need for immunosuppressants.

Critics, on the other hand, have emphasized that many cloned animals will ultimately deform and warn that human clones can be equally affected. Some people worry that cloning may lead to human dignity and loss of personality, as dictated by Dystopian novel "The Brave New World" by Aldesh Huxley.

But despite such complex ethical issues Gurdon believes that once human cloning turns out to be medically valuable it will soon be accepted by the general public.

Should human cloning be allowed and legal? This is an interesting question that existed for many years. Cloning attracted public attention for the first time in about 30 years (Kass 27). After trying to legalize human clones, scientists turned their eyes to animals. Our own president does not allow scientists to use federal funds to study human clones. Mr. Clinton said that the findings involved in the creation of mankind are not mere scientific explorations. He continued to say that this is also a matter of morality and spirituality.

Should human cloning be legal? When a Scottish scientist announced the birth of a sheep named Dolly in July 1996, this clone gained public attention and was reproduced from the adult breast nucleus and sheep eggs. Since this spectacular event, people have been thinking about the possibility of cloning humans. What is the clone like? His / her appearance is the same as the person who made him / her clone ... the moral aspect of making human clones. Many religions and their congregation take the stand. In fact, the general meaning of human cloning is very narrow. Instead of studying and understanding the scientific aspects of human clones, they believe that media and movies portray human clones. According to this source, their decision on the majority of human climate weather is based on morality or immorality. Human cloning is a new challenge

Is it one of the most controversial issues today that human cloning should be allowed? Unfortunately our society seems to always find a more inhumane and serious eradication; it is also seeking ways to escape eradication through immortality. The pressing problem is whether human clones should be allowed in a society seeking immortality under the name of science. I believe that cloning is an evolutionary dead end, using cloning techniques, ultimately to create an ideal person respecting life. So, "As the majority of Christians do, when people are concerned about death, the prospect of eternal life through clones can become provocative, even if it is not desirable (Sanders, 1974 , P.22) Although science may force us to pursue a higher quality human life, certain activities in the fields of genetics and cloning are fundamental moral and moral We violate the principle.