Should historic and cultural artefacts be returned to their country of origin?

This is a very difficult problem. It has two aspects. If the government can prove to take care of their belongings after they regain their goods, they may also show it to the world - I would like to say that is not the case. This is the beginning of them, and in many cases conquerors steal or ro

But let's take Egypt as an example - I am showing countless relics all over the world in the UK. But there are still a lot of things in Egypt to show the world. People who visit Egypt will not be able to learn and see the greatness of ancient Egyptians in an environment like the Egyptian Museum.

The closest thing to me is Cullinan Diamond (3106.75 carats), which was given to the Queen by Jan Smuts and is now part of the crown. Yes, this is a gift. But without the South African public's consent, Jan Smuts is a British cricket who wants to impress the British. Many people hope to regain it, but people can not regain the gift - you can come!

History is history, modern art museums should not be punished in the past because they repaired past collections, the first collection should be treasure by all means. Country of origin will be a bad precedent, potentially depriving the museum collections around the world. Placing wonderful artifacts in geographical and cultural slums, Greek sculptures are seen only in Egyptian mummies in Greece or Egypt who will poor the world and reduce the general understanding of the achievement of these civilizations Absent

Material heritage is historically important substance or building. Historically, however, these artifacts must be culturally interrelated through customs, traditions, languages ​​and literature. If the relics or buildings of the material do not meet cultural standards, they can not be regarded as legacy because they do not meet the criteria of heritage lists. For example, the colonial architectural style of Old Georgetown in Penang represents a number of factors representing the way of life and customs of British colonialists. The method and contents used in the building indicate the materials that were available at the time and the technology executed. It shows how colonialists can adapt to tropical climate, higher roofs and more internal ventilation. Ballroom and chapel show off their customs and religious beliefs