Should Government Funding of the Arts be Restricted?

Article 1 of the amendment of the Constitution of the United States states that "Congress shall not enact any law, respect the established religion, or prohibit the exercise of such religion," People gather together peacefully I asked the government to correct the dissatisfaction of. "This amendment is based on the founders' strongly held minds and ensures that freedom of speech is incorporated into the free and democratic society of the United States.

These concerns caused some problems in social art. First, what should the government restrict to art forms that limit adverse effects on society? Or, to put it more precisely, what restrictions should be placed on censorship and financing to broaden the range of artist values ​​and freedom of expression? Second, should artists consider the influence on the audience in making artworks that may be controversial to others? Art is being promoted more and more in Singapore

The controversy is a problem that the government needs to consider in providing funds to art and reviewing art. This is because art works have been widely spread through advances in technology. Therefore, artistic audiences can easily obtain artworks that may affect or harm. But art is inherently challenging and often provocative. Creativity will be restrained if the government merely subsidizes art so flatly that it harms everyone. Creativity will also be tightened if the government develops a censorship system to limit the technology that challenges society's strong beliefs.

Hirschfeld: I have a question that "Is the government unable to fund art?" This is a "problem of value" and we are as social value. I think the federal and state governments are interested in funding art for subsidies for education and exploration, social justice, and civil protection. The Public Art Fund does not waste your taxes. This is a relatively small investment with sustained high returns. Art funds will benefit various businesses. For example, in 1990, I received funds from the National Arts Foundation (NEA). I used the money to print an exhibition catalog and that money reentered the regional economy through a printer in North Carolina.