Should freedom be given or demanded?

That depends on your viewpoint. I tend to lean on George Carlin: We do not have unlimited rights or rights, at least in theory. Unfortunately, this seems to be ideal, but Carlin has the right to study at the library if everyone has the right to do what he wants, but others will deceive the country or crime I have the right to commit. Because there is unlimited rights, under any crime they desire. This will result in lawlessness because all laws ultimately impede the right to do something about others.

As to whether I am free to seek freedom, I think it is difficult to answer as if you are seeking freedom and freedom, and freedom is given to you, and how it works Is it?

If you are talking about asking for freedom and accepting it without giving it, it is a breach of the law and it may be as simple as throwing away garbage There is a right to leave it where you want it.) From the earth (one has the right to delete another person). As you can see, it is a landslide so you can solve the problem for better response. I am worried that you do not know what you are looking for. Apologize

Various people such as race, gender, religion, social classification require freedom, even political, social and even physical freedom is required. These groups are oppressed. I was deprived of the rights promised to humanity, but deprived of a certain group of people who claim to be inferior. However, in order to judge whether freedom should be accepted, we must doubt not only the freedom of the oppressor but also the environment where the oppressor is free or free. Slavery is simply a lack of freedom, as darkness is merely a lack of light. In other words, even if something is missing it does not necessarily exist. It gives freedom, it seems never been deprived, and people with freedom to be free must first be free.

On April 16, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr. once said "Suppressors never give voluntary freedom and those oppressed need to demand freedom." As Kim once said, freedom has to be requested as it does not voluntarily give freedom, as there are many examples in history due to the need to achieve freedom. Martin Luther King Jr.'s article "I will dream", "Respect of Martin Luther King", "Robert F. Kennedy", Coming: March 1963, Washington's People's History, Charles Gnana, and "Reading Lolita in Tehran", Azar Nafissi's memoirs, various people are treated in isolation and unjustly, but they did not get their rights; they had to ask for it did not

The oppressor will never be free to give freedom. Those who are oppressed have to demand their freedom. In non-violent protests, "good timing" is not a problem. Neither is the attitude of "waiting and seeing". In the experience of Martin Luther King (Jr.), time was on the apartheid side, not black people. Martin Luther King pointed out in this letter that African Americans had been waiting 350 years for the rights granted by the Constitution and God. People can no longer tolerate cheating