Should cops wear cameras?

This concept has existed for a while. However, since the witness's testimony changed dramatically since the fatal shoot incident of Michael Brown in Missouri State Ferguson in August, it became part of a nationwide conversation about police actions.

The idea is that cameras attached to military vests and uniforms can provide accurate and objective explanations of every encounter with citizens. Ideally, the camera will prevent police cheating while protecting the police from unfounded civil litigation, atrocities, or corruption.

Since August, more than 150,000 people have signed a petition for the installation of cameras in all states, counties, and local police on the White House website. In response, President Vice Chairman Roy L. Austin Jr. expressed support for this proposal and said the Ministry of Justice is considering the best way to apply video technology to daily security .

As Austin pointed out, the 2013 report by the Ministry of Justice said, "When officials and the general public know that cameras exist, they act more actively."

Of course, human body cameras pose some problems regarding privacy, such as whether the police need to agree on videotape of private property. Some staff also considers the camera as an unnecessary review and shows that the boss does not trust them

In fact, a witness who used a cell phone camera to record the arrest of Eric Ghana by the police in New York in July could not prevent the damage that led to the short-term death of Ghana.

Nevertheless, early results were promising at police stations that tested military cameras. According to a survey in 2013, police complaints from Rialto in California showed a sharp decline after 54 people in the city's frontline staff began wearing cameras. In the months since the camera was released, the use of force by Rialto officials also declined.

Other police in the United States are currently testing the human body camera. Mayor of Bill De Brasio, mayor of New York, announced last December that the police station is speeding up its efforts to equip body cameras, as no indictment protests were held in the case of Ghana.

"From the point of view of the police, if things happen, it will be useful in many ways," De Brasio said.

"This will improve law enforcement agencies.When problems arise, we will clearly understand what is happening and all the ways we should do."

The worldwide general idea of ​​suppressing killing is to have the police wear a camera. However, a survey conducted in Washington, DC showed that about half of the two groups of police officers were human body cameras and the other half were not. This may not mean that the human body camera is useless. American police usually follow the rules, so you do not have to change their behavior at the time of shooting. Other police units may be different; and body cameras may also make the public better

Requiring police to wear a human body camera will be a step in the right direction. The camera shows what actually happened and can be used as evidence for investigating police fraud. I understand your concern "Police will show it to please them," but I do not think so. Several cops are suffering for the videos they have taken with their camera. Of course, this does not mean that the system is absolutely sure - but the checking and balancing system helps to ensure that the evidence is not compromised.

For all the reasons you may be anticipating, the police officer wearing the camera is a good idea: the camera increases accountability, reduces complaints and, in some cases, civilization There is a possibility of influence. It is a matter of time before police adopt them on a large scale. The problem is not whether it will happen or not. However, many of the assumptions people make about cameras worn by people are not true. We are scholars who have studied human body cameras for many years and in our research we have found three universal myths about equipment. When police across the country adopt this technology, law enforcement agencies and citizens need to understand fundamental disadvantages.

Supporters who improve the transparency of law enforcement agencies can understand that they want to see more police officers wearing internal cameras. In addition to the evidence that police wearing a car camera caused a decline in the police "military force" incident, police camera lenses provide useful evidence for police fraud allegations . However, despite the advantages of police cameras, there are still significant privacy concerns that must be considered and addressed as they become more general.