Until the Civil War ended, these statues were not built, but the southern people of Jim Crow time showed that they are worried about failures and are still better than blacks. This is actually the only reason. There is no "Southern Pride" to celebrate the traitor's free statue and the slave owner. The whole nonsense of "Southern Pride" is based entirely on racial discrimination and "white lifestyle". Personally, even if these statues are destroyed or even mad at the Republican of the martyr, I will not give them a man. However, the art museum is better. It is not the face of everyone. Because, literally, someone who does not care if the only person who wishes to leave the statue is a racist Republican, why they were dismantled, or why they were originally built is there. After losing a slave, there is only one reason for their existence after planting a sense of inferiority to fear and blacks.
By the way, concerning racial discrimination, if you think that you are not at least racist, you may be wrong. Just recently, I acknowledged that I am actually a racist. The difference between people like me and those who protect the statues of the alliance is in our actions. Just because I occasionally have racist ideas does not mean that I do not vote or support voters and local communities. On the other hand, Republicans are at least racist, often opposed to the interests of minorities and often oppose their own best interests.
We may not agree whether these federal statues should be revoked, but those who formed mobs, gathered in public plazas, and violently removed war memorials were not democratic. Therefore, when Arend discusses diversity in this context, it means that politics requires us to participate in civic dialogue as to why we gather in public places and why we want to get rid of these monuments I mean it. Or do you know why we should keep them or how to deal with them? Then, if the people of Durham vote to cancel that memorial, that monument will be canceled. But that is a democratic decision, and this is not the intention of a few people.
Let's briefly look at the discussion on the removal of the statue of the Confederate Army. Did we eliminate our history by deleting these statues? If Mr. Trump himself defeats the statue of the Robert Lee Federal General, he suggested that it might be good to beat all the monuments dedicated to George Washington. His private attorney, John Dodd, later distributed an e-mail that further clarifies this moral equivalent. If most statues were announced shortly after the war, this may bring some similarities. But that is not the case. According to the Southern Poverty Act Center, "Federal monuments and other symbolic donations rose rapidly during the two main periods - during the first 20 years of the 20th century and the civil rights movement."