Should colleges censor hate speech on campus?

The ban on the hatred's speech is unacceptable intolerance of disliked speech and it is definitely a problem, but no solution is found in the banning of disliked speech. Hatred's speech prohibits the right attempt to prohibit unpleasant and intolerant speech, but doing so will prohibit other statements and opinions that need to be shared, and these statements and opinions actually I can not bear it. The banning of dislikes is often used to block what is considered aggressive. Our society should not accept unpleasant remarks, but unpleasant remarks are very subjective and may vary from case to case. Not only that, we also protect ourselves from the government by our constitution. So, if the ban on hatred's speech is not the right way to deal with the hatred's speech, what is the right way? I think that words of hatred should be protected, but it is not accepted by society. If people are not afraid to go to jail to announce an unpleasant opinion, then another opinion is to have people discuss them. If you really dislike this perspective, our society, media, business, and school can take action accordingly. Social exclusion is certainly more effective than the general ban. (However, I think that there should be a code of conduct to prevent objective harm to other people on campus, and prohibition is prohibited because it is necessary to be prohibited. It is aggressive or sneaky and forbids speaking.)

HG: Protected speech is about expression of opinion. Therefore, prohibiting in particular on campuses of the university, from my point of view, is to prohibit review or punishment for discomfort, danger, or other reasons, deserves silence. . Therefore, I think that it is necessary to maximize the protection of opinion at any university, but it is definitely a requirement of the first revision of public university.

One sign of the US freedom of expression law is to forbid the government from censoring or punishing the speech of hatred. In public places hatred and hate speech attacks against homosexuals near the funeral home of military veterans are permitted and the cross on the lawn of an African American couple burns and the members of the US government's Ku Klux Klan The subversion was requested. All of these are protected by the Constitution. When the Supreme Court reaffirmed this view in June, Judge Samuel A. Arito Jr judged that most of the courts are "based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability or other similar reasons Speech ". I hate that, but the courtroom right of freedom of speech is most proud of our protection of freedom by expressing "disgusting ideas".