Should Chinas Human Rights Record Prevent Permanent Normal Trade Relations

Background Since the early warming of the US-China relationship in the early 1970s, it was difficult for policy makers to balance US policy issues in the People's Republic of China. From Nixon to Clinton, the president had to coordinate security and human rights issues with the company's desire to expand economic relations between the two countries. Although the United States is often opposed to human rights violations in China, the Chinese government argues that concerns in the United States represent unfair infringement of the internal affairs of the United States.

President Clinton and the Congress led by the Republican Party are certainly gathering in important issues: Establishing a permanent normal trade relationship with China. This initiative has received strong support from both parties, but human rights defense organizations have launched a campaign to calm their efforts as the record of China's rights is inadequate. In other areas, as the region became involved in new and violent conflicts, the efforts to promote Clinton's peace in the Middle East began to collapse. Some people criticize the President's efforts to further exacerbate the tension in the area.

In the post-Cold War era, the three major factors of human rights, trade, and security have plagued the relationship between Central and South America. Human rights and trade are the main causes of tension against bilateral agenda as China's MFN status was lifted in 1994 and China's accession to the World Trade Organization's Beijing-Washington Marathon in 1999 ceased There is a possibility. The security problem that occurred in the mid-1990s seems to be the most important factor that currently affects bilateral relations.

The main problem surrounding America and its diplomatic relations is whether to give China a permanent normal trade relationship (PNTR). Some people think we should give it to them, and many people oppose this move. However, the reason for not allowing China PNTR is not as decisive as the reason for allowing them. As the article says, this issue divides the two parties. Not just Republicans or Democrats. It is a combination of Republican Party and Democratic Party of PNTR, against the PNTR combination. In my opinion, we should give China this permanent trade position as we are engaged in trade in China for many years, so we have no reason they will not enter.

Democratic candidate against the Pacific Rim Partnership trade agreement Bernie Sanders said, "Continuation of other devastating trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, CAFTA, and permanent normal trade relations with China" . He believes that the Free Trade Agreement has resulted in a reduction in employment opportunities in the United States and a decline in US wages. Saunders said the United States need to rebuild the manufacturing base with factories in the US rather than outsourcing to China etc. and to provide expensive employment to US workers.