Over and over again, the children are vulnerable, and what you learned when you were young decided you to be an adult. Because our government is a democratic country, we have voices and power from people. Decide what changes to make and each decision affects all citizens regardless of their situation or region code. If an American citizen chooses not to participate in a democratic system, it will not function. Unfortunately, this young generation of young people is too focused on text messages and West Coast care politics. Most of my classmates and friends do not care about the issues being discussed in Congress and I will not vote for the 2012 presidential election next year. They saw the confusion left by the confusion and quarrel that occurred in our parents, Capitol Hill. They are forbidden and they do not want to participate. We have to involve them. We must help them observe what they will influence the future with care. We are voice, we are power of tomorrow, we can bring change. Yes, yes, politics should be taught at school, but more importantly it should be taught at home. Studies show that if parents are children, they are more likely to participate in democracy, but that is merely education and environmental problems. Responsibility is not only in the teachers of these young people but also in their families. It depends on them, they shape their heart and stimulate the desire to change. If there are no people in America, there is nothing in the United States. So please hold your opinion, listen to the discussion and participate. Our generation strongly urges you to do something simple. Do not sit in a dark room and play video games. The world collapses around us. Stand up, shout, cry, let me hear your voice. But more importantly, I have to teach the voting tomorrow. Vote
Politics is an important part of society. Because politics is a very sensitive topic in school, there are more reasons for teaching. An article titled "Should children teach politics at school?" An anonymous person was presented, arguing about whether or not to teach politics. Because society is politically based, it should be taught in our school system. As explained in this article, "If you do not understand, young people become more likely to leave people based only on personality, media / public opinion, and it is more likely that they will choose." Politics, it is up to the child to understand it. As this argument is valid, the education system must see that most subjects children learn are essential. Most students do not want to learn mathematics, but they need to make teenagers a success.
Children are expected to attend school for education. They are taught in standard subjects such as English, mathematics, science, history. But how do children accept life skills, sex education, or political education? Educating a common theory of children about a particular topic affects them rather than developing their own beliefs. On the other hand, if they are not educated about that subject, how do they produce their own opinion? Why is the education system hiding certain themes of children? Children need to understand the truth about the concept of life to properly educate them, but opportunities for education such as life skills, sex education, politics etc are not taught in school.
Ibn Sina wrote that children have to go to the maktab school for primary education until they reach the age of 6 to 14. In the meantime, he wrote that they should learn the Qur'an, Islamic metaphysics, language, literature, Islamic morals, and skills (which can point to various practical skills). Ibsyna refers to the secondary education stage of maktab school education as a period of specialization and students should begin to acquire manual skills regardless of their social status. He suggested that children after the age of 14 would choose the subject of interest, whatever interests in reading, manual skills, literature, preaching, medicine, geometry, trade and commerce, crafts, or future interests I wrote that it should be able to fit. Other field or occupation