Should Austin or Houston Be the Capital of Texas?

Austin became the capital of Texas when James Collins and Peter Grayson of Sam Houston confronted the hostile Mirabo B. Lamar in 1838. (Lomax, paragraph 3, 2013) It was formally officially established until 1846 when the Parliament Building was officially established. I think that Austin was chosen as the capital of a more prosperous city for Stephen Austin's story against the Mexican government. He occupied the majority of the population of Anglo Dutch.

After Mila B. Lamar was elected President of the Republic of Texas, Austin became the capital of Texas. President Lamar moved the capital from Houston to Waterloo in 1839 to commemorate Stephen F. "He wrote a history document with a well-known" manager ", but in reality it is more than a beautiful real estate developer" (Lomax 1). Austin was chosen as the capital of Texas because of many factors. One of them is a geographical place. Austin is located in central Texas, President Lamar believes that the population of the Republic will eventually expand. Located in the heart of Austin, people in Texas can easily move and live in that area. Another factor that led President Lamar's decision to relocate the capital was to escape the enthusiasm afflicting the inhabitants of the coastal region of the Republic.

The Mexican attack on Texas exacerbated the conflict between the political factions in the Texas Archive Museum war in 1842. To 'protect' the National Archives of Texas, President Sam Houston ordered them to leave Austin. The residents of Austin doubt the president's motives. Because he publicly ran the capital and forced the archive to return to Austin at muzzle. The Texas State Assembly condemned the Houston incident to make Austin a seat in the Republic of Texas and future states