Should America have free healthcare? Why or why not?

Americans have a national medical system or a single payer only if they accept strict restrictions on the choice of physician, long latency, drug limitation, expensive test food, and expensive drugs in the national medical system can do. Infrastructure is often delayed for decades

Before Mr. Obama's medical reform was done, this generation is unlikely to happen, as 80 to 85% of people polled for their opinion polls that they liked their healthcare.

Today's medicine where Canada and the UK form a national health system are not medicine. Even these countries are presumed to be difficult to start from now. With the explosive growth of technology and medicine, the budget around the world continues to increase. There are 35 million in Canada. There are over 300 million in the United States

As Paul Krugman, a big supporter of Mr. Obama 's healthcare reform, as many people in the United States call it medical insurance, it will be like a Medicaid program.

Currently, single payment systems in other developed countries are much cheaper than our medical system. Some of these can be reproduced by reducing administrative costs and generally lowering the price of medical insurance payments. However, in order to reduce costs like Canadian level, we need to do what they do: to say to patients they say no, they told them they can not always get the treatment they want please.

There are two cost reduction effects. It directly saves money and greatly improves the government's bargaining power. Prescription concentration

But this is not what most Americans want to hear; foreign single payment systems are actually more like Medicaid than medical insurance.

And Saunders is not so pretty - he promises the same cost as Medicaid and does not promise ration. Of course, the reason is that both the cost of the system and the true meaning make it a political loser. But this is the point: a single payer is not a political possibility from here. This only distracts attention to the actual problem.

Health care: This is another problem that affects all Americans regardless of faction and wealth. Therefore, the United States will join all the contemporary countries of the world to provide free health care to all citizens of our country. Foolishness, rigor and politics on this subject are killing people - we must stop now. For this purpose, we have appointed Senator Bernard Sanders, a lifelong expert and enthusiastic medical advocate, who pioneered this new initiative. now

Mr. Obama's medical reform is not free. Because their concept of universal medical care is "free medical care", many people think Obama's health insurance is free. The terms used by politicians are because they sound better than "requirements for mandatory insurance". Universal health care varies from country to country and is not well understood by Americans, but it is important to understand or understand that Obama health insurance is a "compulsory insurance claim". Medical care is not free. Everyone should have "affordable health insurance" because everyone must have (purchase) insurance.

Preventive health care is central to (and should be) the core of any health care system. As explained in Part 1 of this series, the 2010 US Affordable Health Care Act calls for health insurance companies to provide free preventive health care services regardless of insurance plans . It is fairly new, and most efforts focused on secondary prevention (screening and early diagnosis), but it is still a step in the right direction to reduce medical costs and improve medical outcomes. Nevertheless, due to ACA 's uncertainty during the majority of the Republican conference at the time of writing, the benefits of these prevention services may be short - lived.

I am convinced that America should provide free medical care to all citizens and that all American citizens should provide free medical care. This is because it can play an important role in improving access to health services. In addition, by allowing all US citizens to receive appropriate medical care, medical expenses are also reduced. For example, medical expenses will be much higher by allowing you to receive regular and preventive medical treatment without waiting for treatment when you get sick (Niles, 2011). Relevant free healthcare will promote equal opportunities by reducing the number of people living in the social economy (Niles, 2011). This may be due to poor physical condition or other medical-related financial problems. In addition, the healthcare industry may affect some form of life in the United States in any way.