Should America have dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

In August 1945, the United States attacked Hiroshima and Nagasaki cities using the atomic bomb. This was one of the most controversial decisions in the Second World War. Here, a group of historians comment on whether President Truman has the right to approve these nuclear attacks.

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a devastating event for the Japanese. World War II is going to be over but they will not retreat. This threw an atomic bomb on America. Many innocent lives were lost during the blast, and the damage to both cities was serious. Even a few years later, the impact of Japan continues. Some people think this behavior is "rational". On that day there were lots of lives in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. ""

On 6th August 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb in Hiroshima, Japan. Three days later, the second atomic bomb landed in Nagasaki. These bombs reduced Hiroshima (population 350,000 people) and Nagasaki (210,000 people) to smoldering ash and evaporated at least 200,000 civilians. After that, another 250,000 people died of radiation poisoning. According to one of the first physicians who arrived in Hiroshima after the explosion, "a lot of unidentified bodies were piled up and cremated on the spot.The injured and the radiation victims continued to die.The number of true victims You will never know.

Looking back on the bomb explosion, it can be said that it is a preventive measure in various situations. First of all, releasing a bomb means that the war will end: 'The atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki end World War II. There is no doubt that prolonging war could lead to even more serious death in Japan and the United States. Furthermore, the atomic bombs dropped in Nagasaki and Hiroshima decided to de facto use nuclear weapons in the future. Before falling