Aubrey Beardsley's "The Story of Venus" and Tannhäuser's sexy Aubrey Beardsley wrote the story of Venus and Tannhäuser at the end of the Victorian era. This decadent work depicts sex and sex in a playful way in accordance with the beliefs of Boderea's "First art for art". Venus story and Tannhäuser also ridiculed the traditional Victorian ethics, and in addition to imitating erotic ways, also support Foucault's view that the Victorian era witnessed the spread of sexuality.
For example, in 1895 portrait of Jack-Emile Blanche's Aubrey Vincent Beardsley, Beardsley showed a gorgeous pink flower on the jacket. Although Beardsley 's sexual orientation has not been confirmed yet, his portrait in his costume is a portrait of his esthetician Oscar and his friend who committed a crime of "he was drawn to another male official" We support Wild. He was imprisoned for being badly traumatized. In the coming years, aesthetics has become a public weapon. This is the essence of Andy Warhol 's work in the 1960' s. The artist changed the pictures of Elizabeth Taylor and Marilyn Monroe to a pop queen and added a strange twist to the mainstream image. As a gay person, Warhol provides space for homosexual audiences in the mainstream American gay languages.
Another interesting publication by Olympia is Venus and Tanhauser of Ausrey Beardsley. In this book, Under the Hill is a faint reflex, and Beardsley failed to turn his supernatural behavior into tribal art in TB patients, as he did in paintings. Nevertheless, this work is cruel and even pathetic and legal for students who think about living artists. A printer that legitimately finds an obscene book is also guilty of the author, publisher, and bookstore handling it. This places a burden on the printing industry, but it is not appropriate. Printers that have received orders from publishers in normal transaction methods should not predict the operation of any laws at their discretion and should be fickle in their management. In fact, printers are easy to play for security and constitute a clumsy and obscene informal review. One in the 50's