Sexual Selection in Everything We Do

The word "evolution" is often used to explain past and present comparisons. Because there are many definitions, it is difficult to explain what evolution is. The evolutionary feat is usually a genetic change that occurs as a result of a genetic change. Changes in gene structure usually lead to physical changes in organisms. These changes can alter the mechanisms and dynamics of the various groups. However, physical changes do not occur overnight.

By contrast, sexual selection creates rapid evolutionary change as each generation progresses. Sex selection promotes evolution in a stable environment. Sexual choice diminishes the viability of animals (especially men) and has larger, more colorful or exaggerated features. The impressive thing about the cerebral cortex is that it does not focus on specific behavior. There are billions of universal neurons in the human cerebral cortex, and you can learn new ideas. When our cerebral cortex evolves by sexual selection, unlike other animals, is our ancestral mother and father sexually attractive to partners who can learn new ideas?

Golden lie: how sex and deception promote human evolution, civilization and 2016 presidential election

I was touched that sexual options have been classified as natural choices by modern biologists for a while. Darwin proposed sexual choice in his book "The Descendants of Mankind" published in 1872. Therefore, in most cases, if sexual selection interacts with natural selection, is it logical to classify sexual selection as natural selection? Darwin is known for his peacock tail which makes him sick because natural choices can not explain it. Instead, natural selection presents a smaller, more manageable tail. However, the sexual choice still prefers the bigger and more clumsy tail. So, is this a sex selection of clear examples (thousands more accessible) that are working on cross-cutting objectives of natural choice?