Separating the Flames of Reality

In Alice Walker's short story "Daily Youth", Van Gogh can think about that. Life, the pleasure of the new name, you would want to make Van Gogh a "dancing around ash (66)" house. Indeed, Dee changed her name to "Wangero Leewanika Kemanjo". When asking the reason why her mother no longer uses her name for her, Wangaro answered, "She is dead, I can not put up with the names of those who oppressed me anymore" (68) I burned a house with the same fire I want to.

Let's use fire as an analogy to further understand. Fire is a reality, our flames are our souls, or energy blueprints, the heat of our flames is our self. Of course, there are various terms such as fire, as well as unity of reality, such as God, heart, quantum zero field, energy, collective unconscious, or spiritual concept of cosmic consciousness. There are more, each one is valid. We are talking about this issue, but understanding what we are thinking that cutting is an illusion does not mean that it is not realistic, it is not realistic. Our human Avatar is an experience that makes it very realistic, and there are finite truths of many levels within infinity of existence. With this insight, we immediately feel a big goal

The relationship between virtual reality and reality is contradictory. On the one hand it is a real part, but on the other hand it must be built differently from the reality in order to be considered different. Therefore, virtual reality squat down during its ontological position, positioning it as a real part as its real part and its aesthetic aesthetic, and using it to prove the difference with reality Dual Including paradox.

It is irritated and irritated that we seem to live in different reality. Of course, I live in reality, I think they live in the reality of Breitbart ... But I always think that because Carl Robb is a fact that the Bush White House can no longer produce their reality, He said he was not interested in. Based on the interaction with this year's trump guerrilla, robes seem to be correct. But these groups of New York delegates are clearly not satisfied. The most irresponsible is Brett Bayer, an anchor for Fox News. He insists that the evidence of "avalanche" is "every day to come." There is no evidence that the Foundation's "extensive" investigation is ongoing and there is no possibility of being prosecuted - it is not a jury prosecution letter and the FBI's agent has not returned - the prosecution headline took off To do