Senate panel refers "apparent false statements" about Kavanaugh for criminal investigation

The Senate Judiciary Committee announced on Saturday that it submitted an "obvious misrepresentation" to the Ministry of Justice for Surpeme Court's candidate Brett Kavanaugh. Mr. Chuck Grassley, Chairman of the Iowa State Senator's Judiciary Committee, said he wanted criminal examination of personal actions.

Mr. Grassley said in a letter to the Ministry of Justice, "It is illegal to make false, false or fraudulent remarks to Congressional investigators, it is illegal to interfere with the commission's investigation."

"Explicit misstatement" was a claim to Kavanaugh from Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of D Rhode Island. When the White House submitted a statement to the reporter, according to a statement of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Senate Judiciary Committee conducted a subsequent investigation.

The Senate Court says: "The committee seriously takes the assertion and contends the judge Cavano 's claim of felony penalties.

Investigators said, "As early as Sunday morning in August 1985, acquaintance of the member was badly drunk by two people later called Brett and Mark" Said. Male sexual assault "

Cavano denied all charges against him. On Thursday, Christine Blasey Ford accused him of sexually assaulting high school and she testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Cavano testified behind her

Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell mentioned several "unfounded arguments" canceled on Friday.

The Senate Democrats are investigating new claims of sexual fraud against Cavano as they demanded a quick vote to confirm President Trump is nominated by Supreme Court candidate Brett Cavano . The statement dates back to 1983 - 84 grade Cavano was a freshman of Yale University. At least the four democratic senators' offices received information on the allegations and at least two began the investigation. Republican senior officials also learned about last week's allegations and expressed concern about the possibility of their nomination to Kavano in the conversation with New Yorkers. Shortly thereafter, the Senate Republican Party again appealed to shorten the committee's voting time. The Democratic Senate considered the allegation and thought it worth further investigation. "This is another serious, reliable and uneasy claim to Brett Cavano, if they are established, they are obviously inappropriate."

Senate Democrats investigate new claims of sexual misconduct at Brett Kavanaugh University

We learned about the first criminal introduction from trump - Russia to investigate the association of China. Several months after investigating the possibility of conspiracy of the Russian intervention to the elections of 2016 and the cardinal elections, the first criminal proposal raised by the Senate Judiciary Committee was directed to those who intended to reveal it : Christopher Steele. Chuck Grassley (R - IA), the Senate Referee Committee chairman, and Senator Lindsay Graham (R - SC) argued that Steele could have misrepresented the file claims distribution.

Federal regulation criminalizing false statements is more extensive than perjury. Under 18. A false statement to Article 1001, an investigator, an institutional official or a parliament may be a felony and may be punished by up to five years imprisonment. Significant omissions may support conviction of misstatements and intentional misstatements. In other words, interaction with the government, including informal interviews with government agencies, creates a violation risk of 1001. In addition, federal law criminalizes numerous misstatements in bank records and federal land or loan transactions. Martha Stewart (a false statement in the insider trading survey), Former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich (remarks during corruption investigation), Bernie Madoff, Bernie Ebbers (formerly known as " Worldcom CEO) and Jeffrey. Skill (former Enron) CEO)