Self-report and subjective history in the diagnosis of painful neck conditions: A systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Excessive use of imaging diagnosis increases medical costs and inherent risks and requires high quality subjective examinations to improve the effectiveness and time management of medical examination. In this systematic review we examined the diagnostic accuracy of subjective medical history and self-reported items to determine if there is a significant change in the probability of identifying a particular painful neck condition. Preferred report project to follow systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines

1) writing in English 2) neck pain with / without upper limbs or headaches 3) subjective medical history or self-reported project 4) research design report diagnostic statistics or sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio and likelihood ratio Enable calculations 5) Use reference standards with sensitivity or specificity greater than 75%, or diagnostic tools strongly supported in the literature without this data. In order to evaluate the risk of bias, the quality assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study II was done. Five studies on a total of 830 patients met the selection criteria. Common symptoms in the literature include cervical radiculopathy, cervical spondylosis, degenerative joint disease and cervical headache. Personal historical problems have little diagnostic value to identify cervical disease without physical examination. The value of the subjective medical history report is important and further investigation of certain cervical conditions is necessary. In future research, clustering symptoms may provide more insight than individual past items. Because there is no research to distinguish between subjective examination and physical examinations, diagnosis of cervical history may be insufficient.

A checklist has been developed for many research designs including randomized controlled trials (CONSORT), systematic reviews (PRISMA), observational studies (STROBE), diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD), qualitative studies (COREQ, RATS) It is. For details on the available health surveillance report guidelines, refer to the EQUATOR website (http://www.equator-network.org) and obtain specifications for reporting biological and biomedical research We recommend that you refer to the MIBBI portal. Sex checklist. The authors are required to use these works when preparing manuscripts and referees are also required to refer to these checklists when evaluating these studies.

Excessive use of imaging diagnosis increases medical costs and inherent risks and requires high quality subjective examinations to improve the effectiveness and time management of medical examination. In this systematic review we examined the diagnostic accuracy of subjective medical history and self-reported items to determine if there is a significant change in the probability of identifying a particular painful neck condition. Preferred report project to follow systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines

Self report and subjective history in diagnosis of painful cervical disease: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy research

1) writing in English 2) neck pain with / without upper limbs or headaches 3) subjective medical history or self-reported project 4) research design report diagnostic statistics or sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio and likelihood ratio Enable calculations 5) Use reference standards with sensitivity or specificity greater than 75%, or diagnostic tools strongly supported in the literature without this data. In order to evaluate the risk of bias, the quality assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study II was done. Five studies on a total of 830 patients met the selection criteria. Common symptoms in the literature include cervical radiculopathy, cervical spondylosis, degenerative joint disease and cervical headache. Individual historical questions for identifying cervical disease without physical examination are the least diagnostically valuable

Self report and subjective history in diagnosis of painful cervical disease: a systematic review of diagnostic accuracy research