Self-determination Theory

Deci and Ryan (1987) The focal point of cognitive assessment theory is the influence of context variables on motivation. Their model has been successfully used to predict and explain how events related to the execution of a particular activity affect the motivation to pursue the same activity again. Here we explain the combination of Deci and Ryan 's model extension and the concept of discussion on Origin and Pawn state adaptation by deCharms (1968). This expansion and integration provides a model to predict the generalization of the incentive effect of various activities.

Self-determinism (1991) Self-determinism (SDT) is a personality theory that includes behavioral factors. It focuses on the motivation behind personal choices. Since the inspiration of self-determinism is rather interesting and satisfying rather than motivation to achieve goals and get external compensation like money, the endogenous motivation which is the idea of ​​participation in activities It comes from the study of. With an essential motive, look for challenges that can promote growth. The essential motivation will prosper if it is related to safety and relevance (Deci & Ryan, 1991).

In the mid-1980s, researchers Edward L. Decech and Richard Ryan discovered the theory of motivation called self-determination theory (SDT). It focuses to some extent that individual behavior is self-motivating and self-determining. Spontaneous behavior is considered to be the result of essential motivation; it is fun and satisfying, so it is to do activities. People with strong intrinsic motivation prefer to complete work without pushing from outside. Our role as a designer is to design experiences and interfaces to enhance the user's essential motivation and to keep using our products and services. This can be accomplished by recalling the three natural psychological needs that SDT decides to adjust the user's inherent motivation. They are:

Self - determinism supports adults driven by internal urges. However, one aspect of self - determinism contradicts the important premise of anthropology. It is a self - determinism that argues that endogenous motivation is a more effective motivating factor for all people, including children. Knowles (1984) is aware of the possibility to apply to specific children and most adults, but clearly it is better to study the principles of motivation from the viewpoint of self-determinism than to pedagogy We do not provide understanding.