Security : You're Still Doing It Wrong

I saw a lot of articles about security on all the publicity and embarrassment surrounding the US government 's exposure to the sun. "This is your encryption method!" "This is your safety!" "This was ... you were wrong." Today, security is much longer than I allow, but many people It is common to see "safety concepts" confused with technical competence and security applications. Meaning: In fact, please ensure communication. Many people in the industry lack basic knowledge via system level encryption (disk based) or network based encryption (SSL, TLS, VPN).

This is a typical information security error. It seems wrong if you believe that you are completely managing confidential intellectual property. And if you think that the data can be partially controlled, you are still wrong. It also appears in the world of technology giants. Early this year, unexpected e-mails were shocking (but not surprisingly subsequently) revealed. At the same time, go outside and start Otto.

But we need these suggestions. The technical field is moving too fast, we can not catch up, you said, we need help! I know that. However, this is caused by 1) a wrong way to deal with security problems, and 2) a very wrong security. Yes, technology is rapidly evolving. Today we have a thing of the thing. I have a human Internet tomorrow. who knows? But do you know what has not changed? It is safe. It is still the same effort. It is still the same process. Because the investigation to understand it was canceled, you are very lucky. Of course, most of them do change authentication and encryption, but in reality, there is a perfect product, and if it works 100% perfectly there is nothing else necessary. At least that will make your analytical report's decision form tell you

You are very depressed inside. "This is obviously the beginning of a mistake.If you run this project, this situation will never happen." You are wrong. If you are right, if you run this project yourself, your previous experience will improve the execution. You are wrong because the strategy of not being reliable even if the approval is successful is one of the biggest factors in the spiraling of the new manager's death. As you were not listening, the team began talking to each other and other teams. They tried to correct themselves, perhaps they may, but this is a spiral of death. They failed. Sorry it is because all of their data succeed and only the leader is nudged, but obviously the project will fail because you do not want to hear that they are not shared