Today 's Western world is mainly interested in extremist Islam, which brings serious challenges to civil liberties and democracy around the world, but the Muslim state itself is extremely. One of the most obvious form of confrontation in many Muslim countries today is between secular stories and Islamic stories. Discourse secularists sometimes represent national elites, the media and / or military, but if opportunities are given to political parties within the national structure, the Islamic language can be best expressed between religion and social group .
Hamid's assertion is that the existence of Muslims in public life is unavoidable, and the secular Western side must be in harmony with this fact. "Top down secularism requires more violence to eliminate Islam and hope, or to put pressure on even wicked things, except for religion, the social structure of the conservative society will be destroyed. .. and more secular social structure ... it is forcing people who believe in Islam to play a central role in political life, and there are many - and "to force this choice inevitably It will bring "spiral of political violence". "
Religion is not a universal and mutual historical phenomenon. In any case, "religion" or "secular" is a function of the power structure of the Western and Western colonies. The difference between "religion / secular" and "religion / politics" is the invention of modern Western. John Morreall and Tamara Sonn believe that all cases of violence and war contain social, political and economic aspects. Market violent events as "religion" because there is no consensus among scholars on the definition of "religion" and there is no way to separate "religion" from other more likely motives It is not correct. They pointed out that the religious people of the Europe fight each other and people of different religions will become allies in these conflicts because there are dozens of examples in European religious wars.