I think that using two ideas at different times is the most effective way to gather information and form an opinion on a specific topic. But how do you know how to use each way of thinking? Okay, I agree with @Inaya Bhimani how useful it is to have reconnaissance mentality when collecting information and research, especially when topics are controversial. In this way, prejudice is rarely a judgment of cloud computing. However, the idea of soldiers is also beneficial for people trying to prove their perspectives, persuade audiences and persuade them.
The first thing I thought was a lawyer who kept their clients thoroughly and prosecuted others. For this job, I think you need to protect yourself / your team or attack your opponents during the exam. But using the lawyer's example again, I think you need to take reconnaissance mentality outside the court to succeed. For example, you need to thoroughly examine stakeholders assigned to your case so that you can learn how to protect your client and how to attack your opponent while using the soldier's mindset .
Overall, I think that both ways of thinking are necessary to achieve the goal. However, sometimes it is difficult to know how to respond and which mentality to use.
Scout Sniper's idea is to both achieve goals and accurately simulate the world. Reconnaissance sniper will give prejudice to some soldiers, but their sight will not be blurred by battle. Scout sniper avoids most battles and uses blends aiming to achieve the most important goal before someone blocks them. If your goal is good, this might be a good strategy: Be patient before winning to start a collision, minimize incidental damage that is not too far, wait patiently. Complete your work quietly without requiring tribal motivation / acquisition. There are clear drawbacks. If you do not express your opinion directly to anyone, you can not use quick feedback to stop or reduce any bad social behavior.
Just as soldiers' spirituality is rooted in emotional reactions, the same can be said about reconnaissance spirituality - but it is rooted in different emotions. For example, scouts are curious. When they learn new information or solve puzzles, they are more likely to say that they are happy. They seem to be curious when they encounter something contradictory to their expectations. Boy scouts also have different values. It is highly likely that they say that they believe that testing their beliefs is ethical and it is unlikely that they say that people who change their thoughts seem to be weak. And the most important thing is that the scout is based. In other words, self-worth is irrelevant to the relationship between good and evil for a particular subject. For example, they can believe that the death penalty is effective If they show that it is not, they can say. - And I found a rumor - to predict a good judgment