Scientists say data proves it: Blondes aren't dumb

Researchers at Ohio State University analyzed 10,878 Americans who participated in the National Youth Survey of Nation (NLSY 79) in 1979 and investigated the age from 14 to 21 years old. A person between age. In 1980 participants conducted IQ tests and five years later they were asked about their natural hair color.

Researchers who analyzed the data have now discovered that blond men and women are not smarter than men of other hair color - actually they become even smarter - the difference in proportion is not statistically significant

"It points out the economic implications of such stereotypes and in fact it should not be based on them," the chief scientist said. Researchers reported in the Journal of Economics that the average IQ of blond white women is 103.2, the brown hair 102.7, the red hair 101.2, and the black hair 100.5.

Male results are similar. Researchers wrote in the research outline as follows. "A girl with blond hair is more likely to be classified as a genius, IQ is less likely than a woman with another hair color." Myth "

One caveat: About 3% of women seem to express nature as natural blond hair. (Please see why the woman in this country is actually afraid of being blond.

Well, now, a group of researchers began to prove that blond people are none stupid. In this study, scientists at Ohio State University analyzed data from 10,878 Americans who participated in the national youth longitudinal survey in 1979 (this is the 14-21 year old when first interviewed in 1979 It is a nationwide survey of). People did research). They found that a white woman who said natural hair is blonde is as smart as a brown, red or black hair woman.

People say data scientist is unicorn unicorn. The lack of talent of machine intelligence will make us look like a surplus of data scientists. In the data field, in the past decade many people have industry experience. Most hardcore machine intelligence work is limited to the academic circle. I can not train this talent overnight. The lack of talent brings benefits to the true understanding of machine intelligence. Many companies in this field will receive seed funds (for example, the price of each technical leader is lower than the price of each technology leader because there is an initial sign that the machine intelligence expert has 5 times the customs price of normal technical practice) Deep Mind from 5 dollars to 100 thousand dollars). Between the case we chose to consider it in the acquihire category). Several friends told jokingly that "Shivon, you should collect all the best friends in the world of AI and call it a company", but to be honest, I do not know what to say.

Yes, hire an experienced (!!!) data scientist. Why are experienced data scientists saying, not those who have the title "data scientist"? Experienced data scientists have expertise to quickly understand data and to determine whether there is "low cost" that can be gathered using tools easily accessible by organizations, such as Excel and open source is needed. By combining these "low outcomes" and tools, organizations can get value immediately (waiting time of about 1 to 2 months depending on data quality). These projects are used to obtain assistance from other parts of the organization.