Scientific Knowledge: Hypothetico-Deductivists

In the opinion of counterfeiters, if there is no scientist who guesses this before discovery, because the content is limited, the science field is very small and there is no need to guess. Everyday scientists use their intuition to further promote the branches of the scientific community using reason and discover new things. Without personal opinion Popper Science is not here. The legitimacy of science has Popper's own opinion and he advocates the theory of forgery and defense of himself.

Carl Hempel (1905-1997) - Developed an influential scientific interpretation and theoretical verification theory. When he finds that this is the logical result of the law of nature, he thinks "to interpret" this phenomenon. He supports the hypothesis about confirmation - an a priori explanation similar to the way we describe "doing scientific discussions" on this website. Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) - a historian and a philosopher, he believes that the scientific landscape developed by a logical experienceist like Popper is not like the history of science. Kuhn is famous for distinguishing scientists who solve puzzles with ordinary science, a specific framework or paradigm, and revolutionary science when the paradigm is overturned.

One of the main problems of concern and controversy in scientific philosophy is the essence of scientific theory revolution. Karl Popper believes that scientific knowledge is progressive and cumulative, Thomas Kuhn is scientific knowledge rather than progress rather than 'paradigm shift', Paul Feyerabend said that scientific knowledge is not cumulative or gradual thinking about. You can not divide any method. A series of studies that began with Thomas Kuhn 's scientific revolutionary structure in 1962 and depended on the role of science in social context began in the mid - 20 th century. It suggests that evolution of science has opened scientific research on new fields. Partially determined by sociology, positivism does not explain the actual interactions and strategies of human science participants.

The concept of science is often misunderstood. Science is not a collection of knowledge. Science is not a series of ways. Scientific methods are constantly evolving and adapting. In short, science is a method of exploration using a hypothetical reasoning model. The core science function is to try to use the most powerful means available to counter the hypothesis. Science is an incomplete exploration method that can not be applied to all situations, but in many cases it is a good mastery in comparison with alternatives that rely on authority (religious or otherwise), common sense and causal observation is there. The way of knowledge The philosophy of science is related to the rationale for defining the method of exploration making up science.