Scientific and Ethical Justification for Using Animals in Research

To use animals in research, certain conditions must be met. Animal-related procedures must be designed and implemented with full consideration of human or animal health, increased knowledge, or relevance to social well-being. The animals selected for the procedure should have the appropriate species and quality, and the minimum amount necessary to obtain effective results. Proper use of animals is essential, including avoiding or minimizing discomfort, pain, and suffering along with sound scientific practices. Our view as a human being has the right to make these decisions is based on various philosophical arguments.

In animal model-based research, the validity of science is a model. This depends on the extent to which experimental results in animal models can be extended to other species, especially humans.

In some respects, the moral reasons for animal research are more difficult for scientific reasons, as individual personal beliefs will affect the perception of their research. It can be integrated with scientific reasons and can depend on it in some way. Ethical costs of research (animal suffering, ultimate death of animals) are balanced, or the potential value of research for human or animal health, advancement in knowledge, or social benefit is.

Society rejected this statement firmly. But perhaps regarding animals, this argument is socially acceptable. If so, we will raise another ethical question about the use of animals in scientific experiments. If its only reason is the benefit it provides and its benefits far outweigh the cost of animals - then the only animal use allowed in the experiment is that it provides higher costs than the cost of animals To do that. However, this is clearly not the current situation. In myriad experiments, the animals were placed in a painful way, and these experiments did not yield significant benefits.

In some respects, the moral reasons for animal research are more difficult for scientific reasons, as individual personal beliefs will affect the perception of their research. It can be integrated with scientific reasons and can depend on it in some way. Ethical costs of research (animal suffering, ultimate death of animals) are balanced, or the potential value of research for human or animal health, advancement in knowledge, or social benefit is.

In scientific experiments it is estimated that from 70 million to 120 million people annually are killed each year. The rationale for using non-human animals in scientific experiments useful to humans is based on two conflicting paradigms or models of the nature of humans and non-human animals. In this article we will follow the origin of these competitive paradigms and various assumptions related to scientific research. The scientific revolution essentially involves a transition from an old or traditional paradigm to a new paradigm. We believe that a paradigm shift is currently occurring in biological science. The influence of this change is currently inconsistent, uncertainty of the policy of using non-human animals for scientific experiments