Scientific Advance: Friend or Foe?

Advances in science: friends and enemies. Scientists and nonscientists are seeing advances in technology in different ways. Scientists such as J. Michael Bishop have studied the possibilities offered by technology, but scientists such as Jeremy Rifkin and Mary Shelley have studied the possibility of confusion. J. Michael Bishop is a professor of microbiology at the University of California, San Francisco. I also won the Nobel prize. He stated that 'enemy of promise' wants to eliminate many people's misunderstandings concerning science.

Historically, advances in technology are often in the form of hardware, making it easier to judge whether innovation is an enemy or an enemy. This is a TV / here a gun. Machine / This is a machine that makes factory workers obsolete. Over the past 25 years these advances are increasingly emerging in the form of software and it is more difficult to distinguish intentions. Fear will be magnified when people can not distinguish their friends from their enemies

Friends and enemy identity actors can pose a threat, so we need to judge whether each actor is more friends or more enemies. The extent of the threat may not be of interest from friends, ranges of enemies, intimate friends, occasional friends, partners and neighbors, partners, allies, neutral, but competitors, enemies, enemies, and ultimate To be honest it is evil. The game looks like a phone. When a message (information or story) from one party to another party is passed among many parties, each party uses its own word to express the meaning of the message and the message tends to be destroyed Yes. Since different information is interpreted, new information is deliberately or unintentionally generated, the whole information is represented in different ways, so after a few people the information may not be very similar to the original information There is sex.