Science Practitioner Model Gap

The study has shown that efforts to harmonize science and practice in psychology have almost failed since the Boulder meeting in 1949 (Hayes, 1999). Scientist - practitioner (SP) ideally believes that practitioners should do new research, evaluate their methods and research, and share their findings with other practitioners and scientists I believe (Hayes et al., 1999). The SP gap is defined by the managed care system to allow experts to fulfill accountability, to confirm that research is related to practice, and to provide practical persons with a structured and theoretical framework It affects. Become the main scientific paradigm

We believe that the gap between scholars and practitioners is not a theoretical problem, it really hinders the development of management science. It will definitely create obstacles to practice based on more evidence. Some of us are trying to translate and provide evidence to academia through podcasts, blogs and social media, but this is a small problem for big problems. ScienceForWork and Future Work Center are two examples of organizations working to narrow the gap between science and practice. Perhaps they should unite and call themselves science for future work or science for future work science ... or ... ...

Promising approaches are usually not part of the gap between research and practice, but it helps to integrate science and practice and is the development and promotion of public health - practitioners. In fact, other fields (education, counseling psychology, community psychology, organization development, human resource development, etc.) have explained the history of education and promotion of academic practitioners 19. , 21, 35 literature has definitions of several terms (and equivalent terms such as researchers - practitioners, introspective practitioners, scientists - practitioners, practitioners) 19, 34-37 These The commonality of the definition of the scholar - the practitioner is both a producer and a knowledge consumer and is an expert who not only develops and improves theory and science at all times, but also improves its practice and the efficiency of the organization.

The scientist-practitioner model is defined as a training model combining science and practice in psychology, and everyone must constantly inform each other (O'Gorman, 2001). This model was founded in the psychology graduate education conference in Boulder, Colorado in 1949 (Jones & Mehr, 2007) with the support of the US Public Health Service and the American Psychology Association's Clinical and Counseling Psychology Training Committee. This was promoted by the growing demand for mental health experts after World War II (O'Gorman, 2001).