Science Cannot and Should Not Explain the Existence or Not Existence of God

For some people, "seeing is believing", so the world always has a problem of God's existence. So, if a person can not see, touch, or hear God, that person exists. Some scientists and scholars support that he does not exist, but there is a scientific explanation for everything from dusk to the rainbow. For example, a rainbow is defined as "a phenomenon of light and weather caused by the reflection and refraction of water droplets in the atmosphere of the earth, spectrum appears in the sky". An incredible person confirms the previous explanation of what the rainbow is and accepts scientific explanations.

This also means that science can never prove that God does not exist. The assumption of ordinary atheists is that it is safe to think that God does not exist as "leap of faith" unless God proves to exist scientifically. Their beliefs are their unconfirmed beliefs and science can explain everything. This is very arrogant when you think about it. I think there are lots of freedom to accept this truth. If our aim is to understand the universal truth just as we understand, our slight 3D / 4D awareness will make us realize this goal Because we can not do it, we will always be irritated. Instead, it a) assumes that whatever we think is known, it is not the whole enchilada, and b) evolves our goal to 5D recognition and beyond

Axel said that science can not challenge the existence of God and should not try. The same theology can not prove the existence of God. "If you do not tell anyone that there is no god, I will accept it first," he said, "You can believe in science and believe in God. The structure of the universe itself "It's very complicated, very complex, and it seems to be well structured," he said. "Because we understand it does not mean that there is no god."

Collins: Yes. The existence of God is either truth or not. But calling it a scientific problem means that scientific tools can provide answers. From my point of view, the existence of God is beyond the real balance of science because God is not completely trapped within nature. Collins: I made artificial walls between the two world views I did not exist in my life. As I believe in God's creativity and doing it from the beginning, I can see that researching the natural world is an opportunity to observe the dignity, elegance, and complexity of God's creation.