Science and Empirical Observation

Empirical observation is the subject of science. However, the combination of facts and numbers is an assumption that studying ink is one thing. It is another matter to develop a scientific theory harmoniously explaining how all the evidence is combined. After all, science has to prove this theory, even an incorrect theory provides a scientific model for comparing new discoveries. A computer can understand only one, zero is - no. However, human thinking can also correspond to "may".

Science (experience observation, data collection, analysis, modeling, prediction, communication, design, presentation, etc.) is important, but there is no clear correlation between observation of weather phenomena and background of the background. This is disappointing. Maybe that is now a timely negligence. There is climate change. I want to change

The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

The core concept of scientific and scientific methods is that it must be based on empirical evidence based on experience. Both natural science and social science use practical premises that can be observed and tested experimentally. The term "semi-empirical" is used to describe theoretical methods that use basic axioms, established scientific laws, and previous experimental results to participate in rational model building and theoretical exploration It may be done. As long as it does not arise from perceptual based experiences, no philosophical experienceist can correctly infer or infer. This view is often in contrast with rationalism, which believes that knowledge can come from reason regardless of reason. For example, John Rock believes that some knowledge (such as knowledge of God's existence) can be gained through intuition and reasoning. Likewise, Robert Boyle, an excellent supporter of the experimental method, believes that we have natural ideas.