School Vouchers are Against the Constitution

Recent educational reform by Rudolf Giuliani is a two-year pilot program that provides educational tickets to poor children at public schools in New York City. These students receive an average of $ 6,500 per year to pay tuition for private schools, including religious schools. The money they will receive comes from taxpayers. His impression is that when a typical New Yorker pays a hard earned money to Uncle Sam with considerable effort every year, his impression is that his money will be used to fund government programs that everyone will benefit from is.

The problem of vouchers has polarized the Americans. Many are vouchers, many of which are for vouchers. There are few people staying in the middle. Advocates of school vouchers made the conditions of the downtown school where their main litigation failed. For various courses, students who fail in urban schools receive coupons. Students can choose to enroll in other public schools or private schools. Supporters believe that most of the victor's winners are minorities of the poor. As a result, these poor, ignored students gain new opportunities at schools outside the school district. In addition to providing better education for these failed students, the promotion of school integration has also been updated (Culson). Since the school became the land law in 1954, white families gathered in the suburbs, the upper class and the lower class separated.

Constitutional Issues In 1999, federal judges announced that voucher programs are unconstitutional as most schools that received vouchers had religious beliefs. The voucher supporter appealed the ruling, and the Federal appeal committee consisting of three judges in December 2000 violated the separation of the church and the state in the constitution with few non-religious private schools He decided. Public schools in the suburbs participate in this program and open to the students of the Cleveland public school 2 The use of taxes to send students to private and religious schools in Ohio State can be handled in the US Supreme Court It is widely accepted.

The US Supreme Court has created a blueprint for the Constitutional Coupon Ticket Program that funds religious institutions in determining the coupon ticket for the school. First, the money must be used by individuals of "true private choices" of religious establishments, and second, there must be a range of religious and non-religious choices. In the case of the Cleveland case, the vast majority of the five to four courts, more than 99% of the Cleveland vouchers will enter the religious school, but parents have a wide range of educational options including traditional public schools, magnet schools and charter schools I adjudged that I had it. Therefore, the court judged that the voucher scheme does not support religion. Because vouchers are not given directly to religious schools but to parents, they are not aware of the government's religion.