Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis

The Sapir-Wolf hypothesis explains the two principles. One is the principle of linguistic determinism. It says that the way people think is dependent on the language spoken. In extreme terms, this principle means that we can not think about it unless we have a sentence. The second is the principle of language relativity, also called language diversity. This shows that the language of the world is very different. These principles raise several important issues for intercultural communication. Speakers in two different languages ​​have to think in a completely different way if they think that it reflects what people are saying. Even if not impossible, this could make effective and successful intercultural communication extremely difficult. Modern linguists have limited the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis

The Sapir-Wolf hypothesis is the foundation of linguistics motivated by ideology. The Sapir-Wolf hypothesis states that the use of language markedly shapes the world's awareness and forms a prejudice of ideology. This powerful linguistic relativity theory was popular in the 1960s and 1970s and was reflected in practices such as cognitive therapy and neuro-language programming. In the case of people, the prejudice that is judged to be negative is to put the name of the condition in front of the word "person" or "person". Advocates of the first language of people think that this will pay too much attention to this situation. This situation will destroy the human nature of people in the community.

Since Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf have never co-authored thesis, the name "Sapir-Whorf hypothesis" is somewhat erroneous. They also did not talk about their ideas from a hypothetical point of view. Today, people want to call this idea "language relativity theory". They did not write a paper, but both Sapir and Wolf had the same idea. Language can control people's way of thinking absolutely. At the same time, those who do not use numbers like Mundruk can not be counted. They can not say "any device other than the charger cable" unless they actually compare them one by one. Psychologists believe that the largest people can calculate 3 without their digital help. Mundurk is relatively complicated: they can go as far as five

In the mid-1900's, we explored Wittgenstein using the Sapir-Wolf hypothesis, and the Sapir-Wolf hypothesis was introduced into the world of linguistics studies. This is due to the idea of ​​two linguist linguists Edward Sapir and his student Benjamin Lee Worf. This assumption consists of two different principles. First language decision theory states that the human speaking language determines their perception of the world. The second language relativity statement states that the differences in human languages ​​are reflected in the various world views of people speaking these languages. You can use the idea contained in the Sapir - Whorf hypothesis to explore Ludwig Wittgenstein 's claim that "the limitation of my language means the limits of my world". Witstein was a famous philosopher in the early 1900s - Sabir-Wal assumed her husband appeared when he died. Wittgenstein's idea and belief can be related to the Sapir-Wolf hypothesis