Sapir- Whorf hypothesis Essay

Sapir-Wolf assumes that language differences restrict our thinking process, influence it, affect only the languages ​​spoken by people, and therefore the world and culture express in different languages ​​perceived by different languages It will not be. Sapir made this hypothesis, and his student Wolff promoted it. This theory explains the idea that language limits a person to its lifestyle and that people of different languages ​​or cultures can not see the same side of the world. It says what you see is what you say, so people may draw things in different ways for perception. Because languages ​​are not only the main foundation of culture, it affects and determines thinking. This means that the community members have different views of the world, as the language limits perception of people's views. Sapir-Whorf has two different views

Views can be considered "strong". That is, while the language determines that thought and language categories limit cognitive categories, the virtual "weak" version only represents language categories and usage influence thinking and certain types of nonverbal behavior. "Strong" and "Weak" are just a few ways to see the Sapir-Wolf theory. The Sapir-Wolf hypothesis can also be viewed as two different ways; it is language determinism or language relativity. This view may be similar in many ways, but the difference is an important element where that assumption itself implies. Linguistic determinism means that the language and its structure limit human knowledge and thinking, which also interferes with human recognition. This word means people in different languages ​​have different thinking processes

Because people have different opinions about language differences, communication becomes more difficult and almost impossible. Language relativity refers to the concept that personal experience and habitual language is drawing the world for them. This means that their experiences will affect the recognition and thinking they use today for the community of people and their culture. The experiences that people may encounter have a major impact on the way they communicate with others. The Sapir-Wolf hypothesis is mainly seen as language relativity. This assumption suggests that humans are not living alone or living in the world, so it can be regarded as language relativism.

Since Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf have never co-authored thesis, the name "Sapir-Whorf hypothesis" is somewhat erroneous. They also did not talk about their ideas from a hypothetical point of view. Today, people want to call this idea "language relativity theory". They did not write a paper, but both Sapir and Wolf had the same idea. Language can control people's way of thinking absolutely. At the same time, those who do not use numbers like Mundruk can not be counted. They can not say "any device other than the charger cable" unless they actually compare them one by one. Psychologists believe that the largest people can calculate 3 without their digital help. Mundurk is relatively complicated: they can go as far as five

"The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis was named after the two American linguists Edward Sapir and Benjamin Wolf, as linguists they recognize the importance of languages ​​for people and culture.Wolf said 1897 I was born in Winthrop Massachusetts until 1941 and later became a chemical engineer and firefighter. "(Http: /userwww.sfsu.edu/~rsauzier/Whorf.html) Then he In leisure time I studied linguistics and American Indian language. Influenced by the teachings of his leader, Edward Sapir, they developed a theory about the influence of language on the perception of the people of the world. They try to understand the relationship between language and culture, and vice versa. Edward Sapir and his student Benjamin Whorf believe that language determines culture. According to their theory, members of different cultures have different views of the world as they use different linguistics to explain it. This theory was later called the Sapir-Wolf hypothesis.