Our founder is clear about how they want to work with the government. For many good reasons, the choice is not the person but the rule of law. We express our opinion to the government where we live and limit the government. We strive hard to reach a different agreement with other countries. Only one ruler for regulation is not the right choice. Thanks to our founder, the United States has shown a true rule of law.
• Please consider your experience and familiarity with US laws. How close do you think the US rule of law is in line with the definition of the rule of law in world judicial programs? Do you think that the United States does not meet this definition? • The World Justice Program shows that the four principles used to define the rule of law are universal principles. Do you think that these principles are universally accepted by all countries of the world? why? Do you think these principles should be universally accepted? If not, how do you modify this definition to reflect what you think is the general rule of law?
We are a signatory and a proud alumnus of the US Justice Department. We are serving this system. This is because the basic principle of the United States, the democratic republic, depends on the rule of law, the law must be applied equally, and no one exceeds the law. Many of us work with Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein. Our people working with these people know that they are devoted civil servants committed to these principles. We are all working with thousands of associates within the department, and they also pledge allegiance to defend and protect the United States, Constitution and the American people. We know today that these principles and thousands of civil servants who serve all of us are in the department.