Rokeby Venus

Rokeby Venus I chose to call Diego Velalazquez "Venus Toilet" or better "The Rokeby Venus". The "Rokeby" section became effective when the painting was originally exhibited at the Morritt Collection of Yorkshire State Rokeby Hall and transferred to the current National Gallery. Diego Velázquez was born in Sevilla in 1599, then became one of the most outstanding influential painters in Spain. Most of his adults lived in Madrid and were hired as court painters.

Rokeby Venus was drawn during the review as the power of the Spanish church of the 17th century was a form of destruction of contemporary values ​​and not as pronounced as galleries. Therefore, the ideal Richardson 's performance is really opposite, not the image itself. Despite tough comments, the news agency only helped the attack news. Describing this picture seems to be a real woman, it does not make the public sensitive to information, but stands out the understanding of the public and spreads it like a wildfire. This painting is a symbol of the beauty of women since the exhibition in 1905 and institutionalized this ideal to a culture that fights women's viewpoints as human beings rather than things. After the attack, it became a sign to reveal the ideal of the center of men who suppressed feminist movement through emotional expression.

The second trip to Italy led to his painting by Rokeby Venus, the only surviving nude. Rokeby Venus was first recorded as part of the collection of Marquésdel Carpio, the son of Spain's first minister in June 1651. Probably, the paintings were exhibited personally following the commission of Marquez. This fact made it impossible for the representatives of the delegation to be subject to the heresy, the impact in Spain at that time was very large, and it was rare for any Spanish artist to become naked.

If you can not imagine it, imagine one of the great works, Monet, Rembrandt or Rubens will be destroyed. If that is really difficult, see an example of what happened, such as Rokeby Venus 'cut and Monet' s "single - boat Argenteuil Basin". In either case, perpetrators have a political incentive to create ideal architecture from the destruction of art. This did not exist in Lord Elgin, and theft of Lord Elgin exacerbated the conflict and caused only the cultural loss of the sacred monument. During the 11th year from 1801 to 1812, Sir Elgin removed about half of the Parthenon temple from the people representing the Parthenon, then transported it to the UK. Even at home this was criticized and celebrities such as Lord Byron called this action interdiction, and that is it.