Robert Jervis - Perception And Level Of Analysis

At the level of recognition and analysis, Robert Jervis is important to pay attention to the views of decision makers on his or her perception of the world and others to fully explain the important decisions and policies I support the idea that there is. Jervis is more aware of decision makers' concepts including its causes and consequences than trying to understand external policies directly from the analysis of the other three analysis levels he outlined, bureaucratic, national and international environment I believe it is easier to decide. And explain the pattern of behavior; from this point of view, classification or other three level analysis seems to lack credibility.

Global politics is like this, and the two stakeholders are not completely aware of the intent of each other 's actions. As Robert Jervis proposed 40 years ago, recognition (or misunderstanding) is a necessary condition to understand international relations. Therefore, when developing a proposal on how to solve the North Korean problem, it is important to understand who the major players are and what they represent, their abilities and goals. Events held during the hysteric meeting, such as the success of the first ICBM test conducted by North Korea in July 2017, may be copied in Alaska if copied. Despite the relative decline of the past decade, China has achieved remarkable progress, but it still maintains unmatched global influence and influence.

Robert Jervis believes that for actors who decide how to act, they must predict how others act, and how their actions affect their value I will. The actor will form an image and the intention of others (Jervis 1968). He believes that misunderstandings can influence actor's thought and ignore accurate information. He made 14 hypotheses. Seven is about misunderstanding, seven are about recognition. I agree with Jervis's hypothesis. - When you become a moral dilemma between cultures, there is a gray area that can be difficult to solve around the dilemma. What is morality? When cultural differences are so great, can you figure out how morally correct you are? There are already some theories that can be used to solve them to answer these questions and more questions about the world's moral dilemma. Ethical relativism

Robert Jarvis of international relations theorist once wrote like this. There is no strategic or economic interest in this position. International relations theorist Daniel Drezner considers, "Economic benefits of military advantage seems to be at least exaggerated". Military superiority can have serious geopolitical benefits. Therefore, "excessive dependence on military superiority is very wrong".