Rise of Inequality in Society

In the "occurrence of social inequality" In "some stratification principles", Davis et al., Function theory of stratification as a concept that society needs inequality in order to satisfy the important occupation society needs Is defined. The best people need motivation to do the most important work, and this motivation comes from reward, usually higher income. However, this theory does not explain why the inequality of the United States is rising. In William Wilson's "True Vulnerable Group," Frank Levy explained that inequality worsens as a result of shifting the power of money making from ordinary workers to shareholders.

Emphasizing growth as an excellent social goal, social inequality has increased. In developed countries, income inequality has been shown to be related to various health and social issues including lowering of trust and involvement of citizens, which in itself reduces overall happiness There is a possibility. One of the consequences of the trends of people who are not absolute but who try to evaluate their status compared to others is that the possibility that a high degree of inequality in wealth and income will produce a greater degree of misfortune There is that. There are more people who think that they will fail even if they are in good health. Although the exact nature of this relationship is controversial, a recent survey of very large world samples (Verme, 2011) shows that income inequality "has a serious negative impact on life satisfaction Giving "and" Continuing "the result" income group and country type are different "(p. 111)

Discussions on how society responds to income disparity, especially on response at the local level, reflects the important reality revealed in this analysis. In most places, inequality is certainly rising. And the major recession and the subsequent downturned economic recovery are exacerbating the major disparity that already exists between wealthy families and poor families. However, the extent of inequality, its cause, and its trajectory vary widely from country to country. First, the substantial economic distance between the wealthy and the poor lies in the two cities of Washington, DC and Providence, but the reaction to it is absolutely different. While there are many high-income households in Washington, the majority of Providence's population is in poverty. In contrast, Providence faces greater economic and economic constraints than Washington State to reduce income disparity