Right To Die

In John A. Robertson's article "Kruzan: No Infringement of Rights", he claims that the Missouri State Supreme Court has rejected Nancy Beth Kruzan's daughter's parents' daughter's request to remove artificial nutrients and hydration tubes. As she did not personally refuse treatment, the request did not violate Nancy Beskrizan's right to refuse treatment. Robertson also argues that keeping Kruzan alive through this special treatment does not alienate her constitutional rights or her parents' rights.

The moral principle of self-determination (autonomy) asserts that you have the right to "death" with dignity. However, there is no "right to die", even if that refusal leads to death, there is a decisive legal right to refuse treatment. However, we can not kill the legal rights. ^ ^ Social justice (the greatest benefit to maximum profit) may further transform your "right to die" into "responsibility of death" (if you are exhausting family and country resources). If you are responsible for your death, are you responsible for being a doctor (or family) to help you fulfill your responsibility for death? Even refusing me may seem even immoral. If a person summon evil good deeds for a sufficiently long time, good will be evil.

The moral problem is whether the right of death can coexist with the right of life. Some people think that the right of life is impossible to transfer, they can not give up and therefore may not be compatible with the right to die. In bioethics, there is discussion as to whether the right of death is universal and applies only to certain situations (such as end stage illness) or existence. It is also pointed out that "life right" is not synonymous with "life obligation". From this point of view, the right of life can coexist with the right to die.

We have no right to death. Rights are moral claims. We have no requirement for death; on the contrary, we need us to die! Some people think that "the right to die" is in parallel with "the right to life". In fact, they are the opposite. "Right to life" is based on the fact that life is a property we do not own (we can freely buy, sell or transfer or destroy it) is an unavoidable right . It can not be robbed by others or yourself. Instead, "right to die" is based on what we consider life to be "what we have", and when it no longer meets our satisfaction we may throw it away. The idea of ​​"the right of death" is that there is a "life without value in life". But for Christians life itself is worth it. It is not because it meets certain criteria established by us and others.