Right or wrong introduction: Our society generally does not accept violence. There are various things in the degree of violence, some of which can be classified as less violent, but there are also extreme things. Guidelines for protecting young people from extreme violence were formulated. The cinema and literature classification office categorized different forms of media differently. A recent example is the prohibition of GTA San Andres by its high level of violence and low classification.
When talking about "correct" and "incorrect" you can ask a lot of questions: decide what a person's behavior is right or wrong, what "right" and "wrong" are To do. "You can answer all three questions with such statements.The only universal thing is that everything is relative.The previous statement seems paradoxical, but when you look closely, It is obvious to everyone. "" There is no truth "
Human morality (choice of right and wrong) is based on the concept of truth. When we see the Holocaust and cast doubt on the "wrong" and "correctness" of the event, we face the wrong and right foundation. What is the reason why Nazi Germany of Hitler conquered the world and wanted to kill innocent people during that process? After the Second World War, the Nuremberg trial faced this problem. How can the world appeal Nazi 's war crimes? The basis of the use of truth in Germany is the principle of Darwin's survival of the fittest. German leaders believe their country is a good group of "strong", but the other countries are "weak", poor people. The source of truth from Friedrich Nietzsche teaches that man is the source of good and evil.
What is the difference between those who do not know what is right and what is wrong? In today's society, the right thing and the wrong thing comes from what I think is the usual way for our people to do things. These basic knowledge comes from growth experience in society, teaching of parents, and religious or legal instructions. Knowledge has various origins. In Sophocles' Antigone, there are different codes of moral origin among the two relatives. One is the king who established the law, and the other is a woman who broke this fixed law due to her moral belief. So, in the end, ask who is right?