After years of publication, Ridley Scott's "Blade Runner" has become one of the most analytical movies that has been analyzed and discussed so far. When it was first released in 1982, the movie failed and the commentary was negative, not even close to the box office. However, after the director 's editing in 1992, the Blade Runner was reborn and became a highly - appreciated science fiction film. "Blade Runner" by Ridley Scott was inspired by Philip K. Dick 's 1969 novel "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep".
Blade Runner (1982) and Blade Runner 2049 (2017), supervised by Ridley Scott and Denis Villeneuve respectively, are on the long way to the future of hyperopia in science fiction movies. The locus of Destopia began in the big city of Fritz Lang (1926), passed through Alfaville (1965), Soil Green of Richard Fleischer (1973), and many others. Galaxy fighter until 2049. Anti-utopia science fiction movies are the theme of major cities, population overcrowding, unity, inhumanization, nuclear war, ecological destruction, and infinite technical forms. As a counterattack against these anomalous visionary future, Disney tried to imagine the world of optimistic and utopian skills in the movie "Tomorrow's World" (2015); despite serious and thoughtful attempts, this future is More like cliche
According to the initial comments, Blade Runner 2049 (2017) is a sequel to the 1982 SF movie "Ridley Scott", which is better than the original. Indeed, even this is the dialogue we have, which proves the wonderful achievement of director Dennis Villeneuve, but is the critic correct? The list of follow-up movies for the best original content is short. Usually, sequels earn money with the original big hit and are urged together just to rekindle the glory of the past. For studio, such movie marketing is viewed as a less dangerous alternative than advertising new properties.