Richard Dawkin's Essay on Darwin's Wasp

In an article about Richard Dawkins' Darwin Hornets, he advocates arguing that the role of nature is to ensure DNA survival. In the inductive argument, we first need to observe the behavior of wasps. As Dawkins observed, the hornet inserted the caterpillar into the central nervous system of the caterpillar and paralyzed it. After that we transplant the larvae to the hornet. Larvae eat live caterpillars. Applying the concept of pain to this process seems cruel for human thought but in the end this is the essence of work.

* Richard Dawkins Oxford Press, Richard Dawkins Oxford Press, (September 1990. Richard Dawkins inherited the revolutionary biologist's career in Darwin, Watson, and Click and published "Selfish Gene" The hypothesis that Mendel's research did not consider the use of genetic organisms to recreate itself, as it was rediscovered, is to "create" our genes As a result of this simple reversal seemed to answer many confusions that have plagued scientists for many years and we have never thought of evolution the same way.

Richard Dawkins details Daojin's genetic characteristics in his book "Selfish Gene". Dawkins described Darwin 's natural selection philosophy in detail. Dawkins believes that genes work in a non-selfish manner and converge in the most beneficial way for species. "Junk DNA" and bad genes will be rejected or selected by others, so they will inevitably pass. Dawkins explained to us why we act unconsciously with the people related to us. Because we tend to see the intimacy of our most similar genes and the success of our genes our properties can pass through and propagate through evolution. Gene-driven evolution results in gradual disappearance of poor features and natural development to more desirable features

Fisher is not the one despised. As a scientist, he was explained by scientist Richard Dawkins as 'the biggest biologist since Darwin'. He provided a mathematical foundation for evolution. He created the latest statistics and randomized controlled trial designs and later became a key tool for medical research. To explain the foolishness of Hill and Dole, Fisher separates the data and highlights the difference in cancer incidence among tobacco, cigars, and pipe smokers. He explained how much cancer will increase for improved detection methods. He began studying the erroneous correlation and Doll and Hill's approach suggested directly linking the increase in Apple 's imports and the increase in divorce rate.